EDUCATION AND INOVATION AS A DRIVER FOR RURAL DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59267/ekoPolj2302537I

Keywords:

Education, Inovation, Rural destination, destination development, game “Tesla”

Abstract

In this paper, authors started from the hypothesis that innovations contribute to creativity and that children become more aware of in what way they can contribute to the development of rural areas. With children, play is important, and games that strengthen the imagination and encourage children to think for themselves are one of the best ways to encourage making future, strategic decisions. The challenge was to test the game “Tesla” on older school age children from 12 to 14 years old from rural areas. 138 children from five rural schools on Fruška Gora were examined. The results showed that children from rural areas, with the help of smart devices, played the game at the same level as children from any world metropolis. What’s more, through the game, the children showed awareness of the importance of the village, staying in the village and what is needed for the village to “live”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aleksandar Ignjatović, Ph.D. candidate, European University, Faculty of European Business and Marketing (Vojvode Dobrnjca 15, Belgrade 11000, Serbia

 

 

Aleksandra Vujko, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management (Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

 

 

Radmila Bojović, European University, Faculty of European Business and Marketing, Vojvode Dobrnjca 15, Belgrade 11000, Serbia

 

 

References

Boyette, A. H. (2016). Children’s play and culture learning in an egalitarian foraging society. Child Development, 87, 759–769.

Beck, S. R., Chappell, J., Apperly, I. A., & Cutting, N. (2012). Tool innovation may be a critical limiting step for the establishment of a rich tool-using culture: A perspective from child development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 220–221.

Beck, S. R., Williams, C., Cutting, N., Apperly, I. A., & Chappell, J. (2016). Individual differences in children’s innovative problemsolving are not predicted by divergent thinking or executive functions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150190.

Busseri, A.M. & Quoidbach, J. (2021). The structure of everyday happiness is best captured by a latent subjective well-being factor. Journal of Research in Personality, 96 (Cover date: February 2022) Article 104177.

Broesch, T., Callaghan, T., Henrich, J., Murphy, C., & Rochat, P. (2011). Cultural variations in children’s mirror self-recognition. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1018–1029.

Carpenter, M., & Nielsen, M. (2008). Tools, TV and trust: Introduction to the special issue on imitation in typically developing children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 225–227.

Carr, K., Kendal, R. L., & Flynn, E. G. (2016). Eureka!: What is innovation, how does it develop, and who does it? Child Development, 87, 1505–1519.

Carruthers, P. (2002). Human creativity: Its cognitive basis, its evolution, and its connections with childhood pretence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 225–249.

Cutting, N., Apperly, I. A., & Beck, S. R. (2011). Why do children lack the flexibility to innovate tools? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 497–511.

Defeyter, M. A., & German, T. P. (2003). Acquiring an understanding of design: Evidence from children’s insight problem solving. Cognition, 89, 133–155.

Flynn, E., & Whiten, A. (2010). Studying children’s social learning exerimentally ‘‘in the wild’’. Learning & Behavior, 38, 284–296.

Gonul, G., Hohenberger, A., Corballis, M., & Henderson, A. M. E. (2019). Joint and individual tool making in preschoolers: From social to cognitive processes. Social Development, 28, 1037–1053.

Gonul, G., Takmaz, E. K., Hohenberger, A., & Corballis, M. (2018). The cognitive ontogeny of tool making in children: The role of inhibition and hierarchical structuring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 173, 222–238.

Gopnik, A. (2020). Childhood as a solution to explore–exploit tensions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375, 20190502.

Hruschka, D. J., Munira, S., Jesmin, K., Hackman, J., & Tiokhin, L. (2018). Learning from failures of protocol in cross-cultural research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 11428–11434.

Ilić, V., Mihajlović, M., & Knežević, M. (2022). The role of social entrepreneurship in modern business conditions. Oditor, 8(2), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.5937/Oditor2202074I

Kline, M. A., Shamsudheen, R., & Broesch, T. (2018). Variation is the universal: Making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170059.

Knight, J. (2013). Knowledge diplomacy: the role of international higher education, research and innovation in international relations. International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition), 202-209.

Lancy DF. 2010 Learning ‘From Nobody’: The Limited Role of Teaching in Folk Models of Children’s Development. Child. Past 3, 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1179/cip.2010.3.1.79

Lancy, D. F. (2016). Playing with knives: The socialization of self-initiated learners. Child Development, 87, 654–665.

Legare, C. H., & Nielsen, M. (2015). Imitation and innovation: The dual engines of cultural learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 688–699.

Lillard, AS. (1993). Young children’s conceptualisation of pretence: Action or mental representational state? Child Development, 64, 372–386.

Manić, A., Manić, S., Novaković, S., & Karabašević, D. (2022). Job Satisfaction of employees in the municipal police (militia) of the Republic of Serbia. Oditor, 8(3), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.5937/Oditor2203001M

McGuigan, N., Burdett, E., Burgess, V., Dean, L. G., Lucas, A., Vale, G., & Whiten, A. (2017). Innovation and social transmission in experimental micro-societies: Exploring the scope of cumulative culture in young children. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 372, 20160425.

Maksimović, G., Ivanović, T., & Vujko, A. (2019): Self-employment of women through associations in the rural areas of Sirinicka zupa. Economic of Agriculture, 66(1), 251-263. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1901251M

McGuigan, N., Makinson, J., & Whiten, A. (2011). From over-imitation to supercopying: Adults imitate irrelevant aspects of tool use with higher fidelity than young children. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 1–18.

Neldner, K., Mushin, I., & Nielsen, M. (2017). Young children’s tool innovation across culture: Affordance visibility matters. Cognition, 168, 335–343.

Nielsen, M., & Tomaselli, K. (2010). Over-imitation in Kalahari Bushman children and the origins of human cultural cognition. Psychological Science, 21, 729–736.

Neldner, K., Redshaw, J., Murphy, S., Tomaselli, K., Davis, J., Dixson, B., & Nielsen, M. (2019). Creation across culture: Children’s tool innovation is influenced by cultural and developmental factors. Developmental Psychology, 55, 877–889.

Nielsen, M. (2013). Young children’s imitative and innovative behaviour on the floating object task. Infant and Child Development, 22, 44–52.

Rawlings, B., & Legare, C. H. (2021). Toddlers, tools, and tech: The cognitive ontogenesis of innovation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25, 81–92.

Rogoff, B., Dahl, A., & Callanan, M. (2018). The importance of understanding children’s lived experience. Developmental Review, 50, 5–15.

Sheridan, K. M., Konopasky, A. W., Kirkwood, S., & Defeyter, M. A. (2016). The effects of environment and ownership on children’s innovation of tools and tool material selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150191.

Schmidt. M., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children attribute normativity to novel actions without pedagogy or normative language. Developmental Science, 14, 530–539.

Vujko, A., Zečević, S.O., Zečević, L., Nedeljković, D., & Zečević, M. (2021). Rural residents’ perceptions on economic impacts of cultural and promotional aspects of tourism. Economic of Agriculture, 68(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2101155V

Vuković, D., Vujko, A., Maiti, M., & Riad, S.. (2019). Residents’ perceptions of wine tourism on the rural destinations development. British Food Journal, 122(8), 2739-2753.

Vujko, A., Penić, M., & Gajić, T. (2018). The condition of the rural hospitality enterprises in rural tourism of Serbia. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia, 117(1), 53-60.

Zečević, L., Vujko, A., & Nedeljković, D. (2022). Dry spa as a factor of rural destination development. Economic of agriculture, 69(3), 765-775. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2203765Z

Zečević, S.O., Vujko, A., & Zečević, L. (2021). The role and significance of gastronomic tourism for rural areas of the municipality of Apatin. Economic of Agriculture, 68(4), 1043-1061. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2104043Z

Žarnauskaitė, M. (2023). Young children’s creativity education in the context of Lithuania: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, Article 101310.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-19

How to Cite

Ignjatović, A., Vujko, A., & Bojović, R. (2023). EDUCATION AND INOVATION AS A DRIVER FOR RURAL DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT . Ekonomika Poljoprivrede, 70(2), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.59267/ekoPolj2302537I

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.