IMPACT OF DIFFERENT LIGHT INTENSITY ON THE PRODUCTION OF THE PLANT NARCISSUS L. AND ITS FINANCIAL EFFECTS

Authors

  • Slobodan Popovi?, PhD Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, Novi Sad
  • Dragan ?uranovi?, PhD Economic Faculty Subotica, Subotica
  • Bogdan Laban, PhD City administration of the City Subotica
  • Mladen Ivi?, PhD University of Business Engineering and Management Banja Luka, Faculty of Economics, Banja Luka
  • Slobodanka Jovin, PhD Professional Studies, High Business School of Novi Sad
  • Sanda Nasti?, PhD JKP Vodovod i kanalizacija, Novi Sad
  • Željko Grublješi?, PhD PIM University Banja Luka, Banja Luka
  • Vera Popovi?, PhD Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1804359P

Keywords:

Narcissus L., light intensity, fnancial effects

Abstract

Plant production monitoring should be conducted taking into consideration agrarian, economic and other factors. The authors of the paper point out the importance of the intensity of light on plant growing in predominantly urban growing conditions. The authors conducted an experimental research on Narcissus L. The focus was on 8 physical parameters of cultivated plants that are compared to average actual prices on the market of the Republic of Serbia. The contribution of authors is in pointing out an individual physical plant parameter with a decisive impact on its price. Narcissus L. growing under lower natural light intensity indicates that the biggest impact on plant price is that of the flower diameter (β = .555, п≤.001). Plant growing under higher light intensity has an impact on its price predominantly on the basis of the flower diameter (β=2.947, p≤.001) and stalk diameter (β = 2.947, п≤.001).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Albert N, Lewis D, Zhang H, Irving L, Jameson P. & Davies K. (2009):Light-induced vegetative anthocyanin pigmentation in Petunia.Journal of Experimental Botany, 60:2191-2202.

2. Arroyo J, Barrett S.(2000): Discovery of distyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany, 87: 748–751.

3. Briggs W, Christie J.(2002): Phototropins 1 and 2: versatile plant blue-light receptors. Trends in Plant Science, 7: 204-210.

4. Boanca I, Dumitras A & Laczi E.(2014): Integrated System in Landscaping Design and Landscape Ecology: Simplicity or Complexity?. ProEnvironment, 7: 46–52.

5. Chen S.(1969): Carbohydrate Metabolism in theNarcissus Leaf. Journal of Experimental Botany, 20:302-316.

6. Devlin P, Christie J & Terry M.(2007): Many hands make light work. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58: 3071-3077.

7. Folta K & Maruhnich S.(2007): Green light: a signal to slow down or stop. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58: 3099-3111.

8. Hobson G and Davies J.(1977): Mitochondrial Activity and Carbohydrate Levels in Tulip Bulbs in Relation to Cold Treatment. Journal of Experimental Botany,28:559-568.

9. Horton P & Ruban A.(2005): Molecular design of the photosystem II light-harvesting antenna: photosynthesis and photoprotection. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56:365-373.

10. Kandeler R & Ullrich W.(2009):Symbolism of plants: examples from European-Mediterranean culture presented with biology and history of art: FEBRUARY: Sea-daffodil and narcissus. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60:353-355.

11. Kinoshita T & Wada M.(2000): Blue Light-Induced Chloroplast Relocation in Arabidopsis thaliana as Analyzed by Microbeam Irradiation. Plant Cell Physiol, 41: 84-93.

12. Kinoshita T, Doi M, Suetsugu N, Kagawa T, Wada M & Shimazaki K.(2001): Phot1 and Phot2 mediate blue light regulation of stomatal opening. Nature, 414, 656–660.

13. Loreto F, Tsonev T & Centritto M.(2009):The impact of blue light on leaf mesophyll conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60 (8):2283-2290.

14. Okazawa T & Nishijima T.(2017): Effect of Low Light Intensity on Longevity of Flowering on Bedding Plants Targeted for Indoor Use. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ, 51(3): 279-286.

15. Popović S.(2014): Socio-ekonomski faktori ograničenja razvoja agrara. Feljton, Serbia.

16. Popović S, Tošković J & Grublješić Ž.(2014): Environmental-Economic Model of Developing Composters in Parks, Protected Areas and City Limits in the Republic of Serbia. ProEnvironment, 7: 213–217.

17. Popović S, Novaković S, Đuranović D, Mijić R, Grublješić Ž, Aničić J. & Majstorović A.(2017a): Application of international accounting standard-16 in a public company with predominantly agricultural activities. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30:1, 1850-1864.

18. Popović S, Jovin S, Đuranović D, Popović V, Filipović V, Munitlak-Ivanović O, Grublješić Ž, Mijić R.(2017b): The Importance of Planting Pot Marigolds (Calendula officinalis L.) in degraded public spaces from the agroecological and economic perspective. Contemporary Agriculture, 66(1-2): 27-31.

19. Rønsted N, Savolainen V, Mølgaard P & Jäger A.(2008): Phylogenetic selection of Narcissusspecies for drug discovery. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 417-422.

20. Rudnicki R & Nowak J.(1976):Studies on the Physiology of Hyacinth Bulbs (Hyacinthus orientalis L.): VI. Hormonal activities in hyacinth bulbs during flower formation and dormancy release. Journal of Experimental Botany, 27:303-313.

21. Simón-Porcar V, Picó X & Arroyo J.(2015):Range-wide population genetics and variation in morph ratio in style-dimorphic Narcissuspapyraceus. American Journal of Botany,102: 449-456.

22. Sun Q, Yoda K & Suzuki H.(2005):Internal axial light conduction in the stems and roots of herbaceous plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56 (409):191-203.

23. Tan C. L, Wong N. H, Tan P. Y, Ismail M & Wee L. Y.(2017): Growth light provision for indoor greenery: A case study. Energy and Buildings, 144: 207-217.

24. Tooke F & Battey N.(2010):Temperate flowering phenology. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61:2853-2862.

25. Williams C. (2010): Principi menadžmenta, Data Status, Beograd.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-27

How to Cite

Popović, S., Đuranović, D., Laban, B., Ivić, M., Jovin, S., Nastić, S., Grublješić, Željko, & Popović, V. (2018). IMPACT OF DIFFERENT LIGHT INTENSITY ON THE PRODUCTION OF THE PLANT NARCISSUS L. AND ITS FINANCIAL EFFECTS. Economics of Agriculture, 65(4), 1359–1370. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1804359P

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)