SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF AGROCOMPLEX ENTERPRISE/COMPANIES IN TIMES OF CRISIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2103823Z

Keywords:

social responsibility, agro complex, pandemic, crisis, economy, stability

Abstract

The paper points out the maintenance of economic activity and stability of production even in the difficult conditions of the global crisis as a consequence of the pandemic. Especially in the conditions of a long-lasting crisis, caused by a pandemic of the virus, the business or social responsibility of companies in the agro-industrial sector of the economy is observed. The aim of this paper is that, in the conditions of business crisis, social responsibility represents the optimal attendance of companies from the observed activity, and thus to contribute to the sustainability of economic development. The main goal of the paper is that, even in the conditions of the great business crisis – caused by covid 19 virus, in all economic branches and especially food producers, the socially responsible behavior of companies in the agricultural complex does not disappear. The subject of the research is the business of the company "Agroprogres" i.e. the way and model of applying the concept of social responsibility in the conditions of a great and general business crisis and the adaptability of the company from the agro complex to new circumstances. Pursuant to the subject of the research the target group of employees was selected and a survey was conducted from the aspect of the level of social responsibility of the company. Analyzing the business of a particular company, many scientific methods were used to prove the basic hypothesis: the crisis caused by the pandemic did not reduce social responsibility during its duration, i.e. business in difficult conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Baker, I., Calin, J., (1988), International Business Class, Canada: The Free Press, Toronto.
2. Biočanin, R., Badić, M., Milenković, N., Stevančević, D., (2020), Corporatesocial responsibility in post-covid economy and business, Thematic collection of papers: SOCIETY AND COVID - 19, Belgrade, 2020, pp.73-87.
3. Carroll, A. B., Buchholtz, A. K., Brown, J. A. (2018.), Business & Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management, Cengage Learning, Boston, str. 27.
4. Cipek, K., & Ljutić, I. (2021). The influence of digitalization on tax audit. Oditor - časopis za menadžment, finansije i pravo, 7(1), 37-69. https://doi.org/10.5937/Oditor2101037C
5. Cvijanović, D., Dozet, G., Mićanović, D., (2010), Biofertilizers in the function of sustainable development, Economic of Agriculture, 57 (sl-2), II Book: 48-56.
6. Giddens, A., (2007), Sociology, Faculty of Economics, Belgrade.
7. Luković, S. ., & Stojković, D. . (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and global tourism. Hotel and Tourism Management, 8(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.5937/menhottur2002079L
8. Miletić, A., Trajković, S., & Mrdak, G. (2021). Influence of strategic orientation to the relation between innovation portfolio management and success. Oditor - časopis za menadžment, finansije i pravo, 7(1), 165-194. https://doi.org/10.5937/Oditor2101165M
9. Parušić, V., Cvijanović, J., Mihailović, B., (2013), Market analysis of clusters in Serbian agribusiness, Economics of Agriculture, Belgrade, 60 (4), 689-950.
10. Petrović, P., Živković, D., (2021), Maintaining the level of economic activity and stability of the state, Thematic collection of papers: Society and COVID-19, International Scientifc Conference, Belgrade, pp.128-141.
11. Petrović, P., & Vuković, D. (2016). Financial sources of small and medium enterprises for agribusiness and eco-tourism in Serbia. Economics of Agriculture, 63(4), 1433-1444.
12. Petrović, P., Živković, A., (2016), "Social responsibility and corporate philanthropy of companies", University of East Sarajevo, Scientific conference: Economy today - freedoms, competition, subsidies; Andrićgrad, September 1 - 2, 2016, Faculty of Economics, Pale, Republic of Srpska, BiH;
13. Petrović, P., (2019), Serbia in the new socio-economic system, IMPP, Belgrade, 211-229.
14. Petrović, P., Živković, D., (2021), Maintaining the level of economic activity and state stability, Thematic collection of papers: Society and COVID-19, Beograd, 128-141.
15. Pride W. M. & Ferrell O. C. (2012). Marketing. Ohio: Engage Learning 16. Živković, D., Petrović, P. Ercegović, M., (2021), "Influence of the pandemic on economic development - tertiary activities", Ecologica, Belgrade, no.96 / 2021, 21-29.
17. Singh, N., Jain S. & Sharma P. (2015). Motivations for implementing environmental management practice in Indian industries. Ecological Economics, Elsevier, 109: 1-8
18. Szwaikowski, E.V, (1986), The Mythes and Realities of Research on Organizational Miscondukt in Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, ed. James E. Post, Greenwich, Coon.JAI Presss, 105).
19. UPS, 2020, Uticaj pandemije na aktivnosti preduzeća u Srbiji: izazovi i očekivanja Unija poslodavaca Srbije, Beograd, 2020, (str.30-32). ( in English: The impact of the pandemic on the activities of companies in Serbia: challenges and expectations of the Union of Employers of Serbia).

Downloads

Published

2021-09-25

How to Cite

Živković, D., Vujić, T., & Cvijanović, D. (2021). SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF AGROCOMPLEX ENTERPRISE/COMPANIES IN TIMES OF CRISIS. Ekonomika Poljoprivrede, 68(3), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2103823Z

Most read articles by the same author(s)