THE IMPACTS AND ADAPTIONS OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
Keywords:
genetic modificatins crops (GMC), enviroment, plat protection, HRCs, HTG, gene flow, biodiversityAbstract
There is a multitude of concerns about the impact of genetically modified crops (GMCs) on the environment. The main important enviromental assessment of GM crops are putative invasiveness, vertical and/or horizontal gene flow, other ecological mechanisms, effects on biodiversity and the impact of presence of GM material in other products. These invetigations are all highly interdisciplinary and complex issues. Deposite the potential benefits of this new technology to improve the reliability and quality of the world food supply, public and scientific concerns have been raised about the environmental and food safety of Gm crops. In these paper same of most important problems related to the GM crops into the environment are inspect such as; plant protection, ecological effects of HRCs, gene flow, biodiversity, stress, effects on the soil ecosystem etc. Not enough scientific research has been done to evaluate the environmental and health risks of GMCs, an unfortunate trend. Most scientists feel that such knowledge is crucial to have before biotechnological innovations are implemented. There is a clear need to further assess the severity, magnitude and scope of risks associated with the massive field deployment of transgenic crops. The putative impacts identified for GMCs are very similar to the impacts of new cultivars derived from traditional breeding. When assessing GMCs relative to existing cultivars, the increased knowledge base underpinning the development of GMCs will provide greater confidence in the assurances plants science can give on the risks of releasing such crops.
Downloads
References
2. Бошковић Јелена, Бошковић,М., Хојка, З., Симић ,Ј., Мићановиц Жељана (2004а): Genetically modified plants and enviroment. International Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and European Integration Processes. September 19- 24, 2004. Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro. Programme& Abstracts, p.56.
3. Бошковић, М., Browder, L. E., Бошковић Јелена, Јерковић, З. (2000): International survey approach for Pucccinia recondita tritici of wheat using multilocation testing. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 35 (1- 4), pp. 351-358.
4. Bouchard, E., Michaud, D., & Cloutier, C. (2003) Molecular interactions between an insect predator and its herbivore prey on transgenic potato expressing a cysteine proteinase inhibitor from rice. Mol Ecol, 12, 2429-2437.
5. Conner, A.J., Glare, T.R., & Nap, J.-P. (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant J, 33, 19-46.
6. Costanza, R., De Arge, De Groot,R. (1997): The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387: 253-260.
7. Cresswell, J.E., Osborne, J.L., & Bell, S.A. (2002) A model of pollinatormediated gene flow between plant populations with numerical solutions for bumblebees pollinating oilseed rape. Oikos, 98, 375-384.
8. Dale, P.J. (2002) The environmental impact of genetically modified (GM) crops: a review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 138, 245-248.
9. Daniell, H. (2002): Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nature Biotechnology 20:581-586.
10. Dewar, A.M., May, M.J., Woiwod, I.P., Haylock, L.A., Champion, G.T., Garner, B.H., Sands, R.J.N., Qi, A., Pidgeon, J.D. (2003) A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 270, 335-340.
11. Fagan, J., Schoel, B., Haegert, A., Moore, J., Beeby, J. (2003) Performance assessment under field conditions of a rapid immunological test for transgenic soybeans. Int J Food Sci Tech, 36, 357-367.
12. FAO (2003): Expert Consultation of Enviromental Effects of Geneticlly Modified Crops, 16-18 June 2003, Rome, Italy.
13. Kwon, Y.w., Kim, D.S., Yim, K.-O. (2001) Herbicide-resistant genetically modified crop: assessment and management of gene flow. Weed Biol Manage, 1, 96-107.
14. Lu, B. R., A. A. Snow. (2005): Gene flow from genetically modified rice and it environmental consequences. BioScience 55: 669-678.
15. Marshall, E.J.P., Brown, V.K., Boatman, N.D., Lutman, P.J.W., Squire, G.R., Ward, L.K. (2003) The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res, 43, 77-89.
16. Perry, J.N. (2002) Sensitive dependencies and separation distances for genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 269, 1173-1176.
17. Pretty, J. (2001) The rapid emergence of genetic modification in world agriculture: contested risks and
18. Molecular Biology and Genetics, Vol.3.
19. Snow, A.A., Andow, D.A., Gepts, P., Hallerman, E. M., Power, A., Tiedje, J.M., Wolfenbarger, L.L.(2004): Genetically engineered organisms and the environment:Current status and recommendations. ESA Public Affairs Office, GEO Position Paper 2004, 1-38.