IMPACT OF EU REGIONAL POLICY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION OF AP VOJVODINA AND POSSIBILITIES OF USE OF THE PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1803045PKeywords:
EU regional policy, AP Vojvodina, IPA programme, IPA II programme, cross-border cooperationAbstract
The paper analyses the practical application of pre accession funds in the function of regional development, in the case of development of cross-border cooperation of AP Vojvodina in the period 2007-2013. The results obtained point to the fact that the districts in AP Vojvodina are with the most attracted assets and applicants in the period of IPA programme implementation: South Bačka district (cross border cooperation - Hungary and Serbia) and South Banat district (cross-border cooperation - Romania and Serbia); that most assets and most projects were realised in cross border cooperation between Hungary and Serbia; that the participation of realised assets in AP Vojvodina are the following: Hungary - Serbia: 27,35%; Romania - Serbia: 12,98%; Croatia - Serbia: 1,64%; Bosnia and Herzegovina - Serbia: 0,21%. Within the conclusion, an overview was made of the possibilities of the use of IPA II programme for the period 2014-2020 by AP Vojvodina.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Algebra University College, Basic information on EU funds, (available at: http://algebra.hr/.../Osnovne-informacije-o-EU-fondovima.pdf, 11.11.2017).
2. European Commission (2014): European Union policies: Regional policy, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
3. European Commission (2011): Cohesion policy 2014-2020 – investment in growth and employment, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
4. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Regional Policy, European Structural and Investment Funds, (available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/, 10.11.2017).
5. Europe 2020 - A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, European Commission, Communication from the Commission COM (2010) 2020, Brussels 2010.
6. Golić, D., Počuča, S. (2017): Decentralized and delegated affairs of a state administration in the field of Agriculture, Economics of Agriculture, vol. 64, No. 2, 769-785, Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade, The Republic of Serbia.
7. Group of authors (2016): AP Vojvodina development programme 2014-2020, (available at: http://programrazvoja.vojvodina.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Program_razvoja_AP_Vojvodine_2014_2020_3891.pdf, 13.11.2017).
8. Kačar, B., Curić, J., Ikić, S. (2016): Local economic development in theories of regional economies and rural studies, Economics of Agriculture, vol. 63, No. 1, 231-246, Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade, The Republic of Serbia.
9. Komšić, J. (2007): European regionalism principles, Association of Multiethnic Cities of Southeast Europe– Philia, Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia.
10. Kronja, J. (2015): Europe 2020 Strategy: four years later, European Movement in Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
11. Međak, V., Majstorović, S. (2004): Regional policy of the European Union, EU Accession Office, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
12. Mirić, O. (2014): Analysis of the impact of the process of Serbias accession to the European Union on local governments - area of regional (cohesion) policy of the European Union, "Support to Local Self-Governments in Serbia in the Process of European Integration" programme, Standing Conference of Cities and Municipalities, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
13. Mirić, O. (2009): Regional policy of the European Union as an engine of economic development, European Movement in Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
14. Pejović, A., Živadinović, B., Lazarević, G., Knežević, I., Lazović, M., Mirić, O. (2011): Instrument for EU Pre-Accession Assistance 2007–2013, European Movement in Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
15. Pejović, A., Lazović, M., Mirić, O., Knežević, I. (2014): Guide for IPA II Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance 2014-2020, European Movement in Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
16. Regional Development, Regional Development Policy of the European Union, (available at: http://www.regionalnirazvoj.gov.rs/Lat/ShowNARRFolder. aspx?mi=27, 12.11.2017).
17. Vuković, D., Jovanović, A., Grubišić, Z. (2012): The economic aspect of the regionalisation of European countries, Journal of the Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić", vol. 62, no. 1, p. 31-48, Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić" Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Republic of Serbia.
2. European Commission (2014): European Union policies: Regional policy, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
3. European Commission (2011): Cohesion policy 2014-2020 – investment in growth and employment, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
4. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Regional Policy, European Structural and Investment Funds, (available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/, 10.11.2017).
5. Europe 2020 - A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, European Commission, Communication from the Commission COM (2010) 2020, Brussels 2010.
6. Golić, D., Počuča, S. (2017): Decentralized and delegated affairs of a state administration in the field of Agriculture, Economics of Agriculture, vol. 64, No. 2, 769-785, Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade, The Republic of Serbia.
7. Group of authors (2016): AP Vojvodina development programme 2014-2020, (available at: http://programrazvoja.vojvodina.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Program_razvoja_AP_Vojvodine_2014_2020_3891.pdf, 13.11.2017).
8. Kačar, B., Curić, J., Ikić, S. (2016): Local economic development in theories of regional economies and rural studies, Economics of Agriculture, vol. 63, No. 1, 231-246, Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade, The Republic of Serbia.
9. Komšić, J. (2007): European regionalism principles, Association of Multiethnic Cities of Southeast Europe– Philia, Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia.
10. Kronja, J. (2015): Europe 2020 Strategy: four years later, European Movement in Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
11. Međak, V., Majstorović, S. (2004): Regional policy of the European Union, EU Accession Office, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
12. Mirić, O. (2014): Analysis of the impact of the process of Serbias accession to the European Union on local governments - area of regional (cohesion) policy of the European Union, "Support to Local Self-Governments in Serbia in the Process of European Integration" programme, Standing Conference of Cities and Municipalities, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
13. Mirić, O. (2009): Regional policy of the European Union as an engine of economic development, European Movement in Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
14. Pejović, A., Živadinović, B., Lazarević, G., Knežević, I., Lazović, M., Mirić, O. (2011): Instrument for EU Pre-Accession Assistance 2007–2013, European Movement in Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
15. Pejović, A., Lazović, M., Mirić, O., Knežević, I. (2014): Guide for IPA II Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance 2014-2020, European Movement in Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.
16. Regional Development, Regional Development Policy of the European Union, (available at: http://www.regionalnirazvoj.gov.rs/Lat/ShowNARRFolder. aspx?mi=27, 12.11.2017).
17. Vuković, D., Jovanović, A., Grubišić, Z. (2012): The economic aspect of the regionalisation of European countries, Journal of the Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić", vol. 62, no. 1, p. 31-48, Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić" Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Republic of Serbia.
Downloads
Published
2018-09-23
How to Cite
Počuča, M., Matijašević-Obradović, J., & Golić, D. (2018). IMPACT OF EU REGIONAL POLICY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION OF AP VOJVODINA AND POSSIBILITIES OF USE OF THE PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE. Ekonomika Poljoprivrede, 65(3), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1803045P
Issue
Section
Original scientific papers
