RECIPROCITY BETWEEN LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY AND RESULTS OF TRANSITION

Authors

  • Simo V. Stevanovi?, PhD Faculty of Agriculture, Belgrade
  • Milutin T. ?orovi?, PhD Faculty of Agriculture, Belgrade
  • Milan R. Milanovi?, PhD Megatrend University, Belgrade

Keywords:

economic development, ex-SFRY countries, transition, results of transition.

Abstract

In this paper is given analysis of reciprocity between level of development of economy and results of transition on example of ex-SFRY countries in period from 1945 until 2008. Analysed period is divided in three sub-periods.

First sub-period of Kingdom of Yugoslavia is marked with low level of economic growth, just over the rate of natural increase of number of inhabitants and domination of foreign capital in key areas of economy.

In first sub-period, SFRY achieved high rates of economy grow, approximately the same level in all republics, with increased country obligations abroad and with hint of economic crises that arise in 1990s.

Second sub-period marked disintegration of SFRY, civil war on area of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, negative rate of economic growth in first and mild economic recovery in second half of 1990s. However, on the contrary of exSFRY countries, they managed to fulfil full economic stability and high rates of economic growth. Today those countries are members of European Union.

Period after 2000 (Third fourth sub-period) is marked with high rates of economic growth in almost all ex-SFRY countries, along with stabilisation of other indicators and adjustment with criteria from Maastricht for EU accession. Serbia has achieved good results in this sub-period, comparing to previous, but they are still lower from those achieved at the beginning of 1990s.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Havlik, P. (ed. et al.) 2000: The Transition Countries in Early 2000: Improved Outlook for Growth, But Unemployment is Still Rising, Research Reports No. 266.
2. König, M., Кушић, С. (2004): Земље Источне Еуропе на путу у Еуропску унију - Од транзиције до интеграције, Економски преглед, вол. 55, број 1- 2, Загреб, стр. 132-156.
3. Podkaminer, L., et al. (2005): Back from the Peak, Growth in Transition Countries Returns to Standard Rate of Catching-up, Research Report, No. 320, pp. 2-44.
4. Симић, Ј. (1998): Економика и привредни систем Југославије, Пољопривредни факултет, Београд.
5. Стевановић, С., Ђоровић, М., Милановић, М. (2008): Анализа неких резултата досадашње транзиције у Србији и источноевропским земљама. Економске теме, Вол. 28, број 3, Ниш, стр. 99-110.
6. Stevanović, S., Đorović, M., Milanović, M. (2007): Contraversies of the Transition in Serbia and the Countries of East Europe, Thematic Proceedings Development of Agriculture and Rural Areas, in Central and Eastern Europe, Novi Sad, EAAE, Serbian Association of Agricultural Economists, Belgrade, pp. 169-176.
7. Веселица, В., Војнић, Д. (2007): Quo vadis Croatia? Политика, економска политика и економска знаност, Економски преглед, год. 58 бр. 12., стр. 899-940.
8. WIIW Research Reports/341, Jul, 2007, Special issue on economic prospects for Central, East and South east Europe.

Downloads

Published

2009-12-31

How to Cite

V. Stevanović, S., T. Đorović, M., & R. Milanović, M. (2009). RECIPROCITY BETWEEN LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY AND RESULTS OF TRANSITION. Ekonomika Poljoprivrede, 56(4), 551–563. Retrieved from https://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/1163

Most read articles by the same author(s)