LONG-TERM TRENDS IN FOOD CONSUMPTION: COMPARISON BETWEEN SERBIA AND GREECE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1904975B

Keywords:

Food Consumption, GDP, Economic Transition, Forecasts

Abstract

This study analyses the relationship between food consumption and income, taking the consumption (per capita) of different food categories and GDP (per capita) as indicators. It presents the time series trends and compares the food consumption patterns for two countries – Serbia and Greece - an upper-middle income country outside of the EU and a high-income EU member country, respectively. The analysis showed that consumption of all food groups in Serbia (except milk) over two decades (1994-2016) is significantly affected by the changes in the GDP; while in Greece, only consumption of meat, fruits, grains, and sweetened products was positive or negative influenced by GDP. Trend analysis of the consumption of the different food categories showed huge differences between the two countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Barjolle D., Brecic R., Cerjak M., Giraud, G. (2015). Traditional Food in Western Balkan Countries Consumers Perceptions and Habits. 145th EAAE Seminar "Intellectual Property Rights for Geographical Indications: What is at Stake in the TTIP?" Parma, Italy.
2. Brankov T., Lovre, I. (2017). Food security in the former Yugoslav republics. Economics of Agriculture, 64(2): 701-721.
3. Brankov T. (2018). Food Policy in the Republic of Serbia. Reference Module in Food Science. Elsevier, 1–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22394-9.
4. Burggraf C., Kuhn L., ZHAO Q.R., Teuber R., Glauben T. (2015). Economic growth and nutrition transition: an empirical analysis comparing demand elasticities for foods in China and Russia. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(6): 1008-1022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60985-0.
5. FAO, 2015. FAO Statistical Pocketbook. Rome, Italy.
6. Gerbens-Leenes P.W., Nonhebel S., Krol M.S. (2010). Food consumption patterns and economic growth. Increasing affluence and the use of natural resources. Appetite, 55(3): 597-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.09.013.
7. Ghassemi H., Harrison G., Mohammad K. (2002). An accelerated nutrition transition in Iran. Public health nutrition, 5(1a): 149-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2001287.
8. Jahns L., Baturin A., Popkin B.M., (2003). Obesity, diet, and poverty: trends in the Russian transition to market economy. European journal of clinical nutrition, 57(10): 1295-1302.
9. Ivanova L., Dimitrov P., Ovcharova D., Dellava J., Hoffman D. J. (2006). Economic transition and household food consumption: a study of Bulgaria from 1985 to 2002. Economics & Human Biology, 4(3): 383-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2006.08.001.
10. Kalaitzidis A., Zahariadis N. (2015). Greeces Trouble with European Union Accession. Cahiers de la Méditerranée, 90: 71-84.
11. Kim S., Moon S., Popkin B.M. (2000). The nutrition transition in South Korea. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 71(1): 44-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/71.1.44.
12. Lipoeto N. I., Wattanapenpaiboon N., Malik A., Wahlqvist M.L. (2004). Nutrition transition in west Sumatra, Indonesia. Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 13(3): 312-316.
13. Lovre K., Brankov T. (2015). The supermarket revolution in the Balkan countries: The case of Serbia. Agroeconomia Croatica, 5(1): 1-10.
14. Madanat H.N., Troutman K.P., Al-Madi B. (2008). The nutrition transition in Jordan: the political, economic and food consumption contexts. Promotion & education, 15(1): 6-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1025382307088092.
15. Monteiro C.A., Moura E.C., Conde W.L., Popkin B.M. (2004). Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82: 940-946.
16. Popkin B.M. (2001). Nutrition in transition: the changing global nutrition challenge. Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 10: S13-S18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-6047.2001.0100s1S13.x.
17. Popkin B.M. (2002). The shift in stages of the nutrition transition in the developing world differs from past experiences! Public health nutrition, 5(1A): 205-214.
18. Popkin B.M. (2006). Global nutrition dynamics: the world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases–. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 84(2): 289-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/84.2.289.
19. Simić S., Milićević M. Š., Matejić B., Marinković J., Adams O. (2010). Do we have primary health care reform? The story of the Republic of Serbia. Health policy, 96(2): 160-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.015.
20. Simopoulos, A.P. (2001). The Mediterranean diets: what is so special about the diet of Greece? The scientifc evidence. The Journal of nutrition, 131(11): 3065S-3073S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/131.11.3065S.
21. Trichopoulou A., Vasilopoulou E., Georga K., Soukara S., Dilis, V. (2006). Traditional foods: Why and how to sustain them. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 17(9): 498-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2006.03.005.
22. Tuncer A.C. (2017). Conditionality, Fiscal Rules and International Financial Control in the European Periphery before 1914. In: Cardinale, I., Scazzieri, R. (Eds.). The political economy of the Eurozone. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 96-129.
23. Vujcic I.S., Sipetic S.B., Dubljanin E.S., Vlajinac H.D. (2013). Trends in mortality rates from coronary heart disease in Belgrade (Serbia) during the period 1990–2010: a joinpoint regression analysis. BMC cardiovascular disorders, 13(1): 112.
24. Zekic S., Gajic M., Matkovski B. (2013). Serbian agriculture in the regional and European integratons. In: Tomic, D., Sevarlic, M., Lovre, K., Zekic, S. (Eds.), 135 EAAE Seminar Challenges for the Global Agricultural Trade Regime after Doha. DAES, Belgrade, 369–376.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-25

How to Cite

Brankov, T., Markopoulos, T., & Kontakos, S. (2019). LONG-TERM TRENDS IN FOOD CONSUMPTION: COMPARISON BETWEEN SERBIA AND GREECE. Economics of Agriculture, 66(4), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1904975B

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers