Rural infrastructure and the role of social capital in Serbia

  • Maaike Runia Wageningen University, Department of Social Sciences, The Netherlands
  • Natalija Bogdanov Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade
  • Wim Heijman Wageningen University, Department of Social Sciences, The Netherlands

Abstract

The starting point of this research is the assumption that infrastructural development in Serbia could be the key to economic growth. The aim of this research is to present an overview of the level of development in rural Serbia with a focus on infrastructure. The research compares twelve rural Serbian districts on the basis of data about the three categories economic performance, infrastructure development and social capital. Outcomes of the research are an analysis of the relations between the three categories and a comparison of the Serbian districts. The two main findings of this research are that the positive influence of infrastructure on economic development is not convincingly proven for Serbia and that the relation between economic development and social capital (measured by election data) turns out to be negative instead of positive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bogdanov, N., Meredith, D. and Efstratoglou, S. (2008). A typology of rural areas in Serbia. Ekonomski Anali, vol. 53, issue 177, 7-29.
2. Bronisz, U. and Heijman, W.J.M. (2010). The Relationships between Social Capital and Regional Competitiveness in Poland. APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 4 (1-2), 43-48.
3. Danchev, A. (2005). Social Capital Influence on Sustainability of Development (Case Study of Bulgaria). Sustainable Development, 13, 25-37.
4. Durlauf, S.N. and Fafchamps, M. (2004). Social Capital. Retrievable from: http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/members/marcel.fafchamps/homepage/soccaphandbook.pdf.
5. ERF (2010). The European Union Road Federation. http://www.erf.be /index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64&Itemid=4. Retrieved June 2010.
6. Escobal, J. (2005). The Role of Public Infrastructure in Market Development in Rural Peru. Wageningen: PhD Thesis, Wageningen University.
7. Nemes, G. (2005). Integrated Rural Development, The Concept and its Operation. Budapest: Institute of Economics Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
8. Paldam, M. (2000). Social Capital: One or Many? Defnition and Measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 14, no. 5, 630-650.
9. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
10. RZS (2009). Municipalities of Serbia 2008.Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia.
11. RZS (2010). Statistical Offce of the Republic of Serbia. Retrievable from: http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/axd/en/pok.php?god=2009.
12. UNDP (2008). Human Development Report Serbia Regional Cooperation. Belgrade: UNDP.
13. World Bank (2010). Infrastructure. http://data.worldbank.org/topic/ infrastructure. Retrieved June 2010.
Published
2010-12-03
How to Cite
RUNIA, Maaike; BOGDANOV, Natalija; HEIJMAN, Wim. Rural infrastructure and the role of social capital in Serbia. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 57, n. Spec.num.2, p. 589-597, dec. 2010. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <http://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/1044>. Date accessed: 28 sep. 2020.