PERSPECTIVES OF INNOVATION IN SERBIAN FIRMS - EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM AGRO-FOOD AND SOFTWARE INDUSTRY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1803171MKeywords:
management, innovation indicators, agro-food industry, software industryAbstract
Based on the available literature on theory of innovation and the data processed from the official research on innovation activities in Serbian firms, this paper shows different perspectives of usage of the innovation activities indicators. The results showed that firms involved in software sector are more innovative than firms in agro food sector. On the basis of the research conducted in this paper, it is possible to draw conclusions which are significant to the management of enterprises in observed industries. According to these recommendations, innovative enterprises management could respond to problematic situation of business economy in the field of innovation management through adequate business strategies. Besides that, empirical research in innovative activities in Serbia in the two observed sectors yield a serious analytic framework to guide industrial policy and employ appropriate measures in order to improve national competitiveness based on knowledge.
Downloads
References
2. Aralica, Z., Račić, D., & Radić, D. (2008). Innovation propensity in Croatian Enterprises: Results of the Community Innovation Survey, South East European Journal of Economics and Business 3(1), 77–88, DOI: 10.2478/v10033-008-0008-6.
3. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium, The American Economic Review 92 (4), 1169- 1184.
4. Copus, A., Skuras, D., & Tsegendi, K. (2008). An Empirical Comparative Study of SMEs in Six European Union Member Countries, Economic Geography 84 (1), 51-82.
5. Dosi, G. (1988). The nature of innovative process. In Technical Change and Economic theory, Dosi, G. et al.eds., Pinter Publishing Limited. London, UK . 221- 239.
6. Drucker, P. (2003). The Essential Drucker, Novi Sad: Adižes.
7. Franconi, L., & Stander, J. (2002). A model-based method for disclosure limitation of business microdata, The Statistician, 51(1), 51-61.
8. Goedhuys, M., & Veugelers, R. (2012). Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23, 516– 529.
9. Gotz, M. (2015). Innovations in Solving Eurozone Crisis: Review of Some Unconventional Proposals, Transformations in Business & Economics, 14 (34), 161-173.
10. Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
11. Jović, Z., Vićentijević, K., & Glišović, N. (2016). Sustainable growth rate of agricultural and food enterprises in Serbia, Economics of Agriculture, 63, 9-29.
12. Knell, M. (2008). Product-embodied technology diffusion and intersectoral linkage in Europe, Europe INNOVA Sectorial Watch deliverable WP4, Brussels: European Commission.
13. Živković, L., Kutlača, Dj., Kleibrink A., & Štrbac, D. (2018). Characteristics of the Software Industry in Serbia, Ekonomika preduzeća, 3-4, 226-235.
14. Holroyd, C. (2007). Science and Technology Policies, National Competitiveness and the Innovation Divide, Working Paper No.32, The Centre for International Governance Innovation, Retrieved from www.cigionline.org, (July 2017)
15. Leiponen, A. (2005). Skills and Innovation, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 23, 303-323.
16. Lippoldt, D., & Stryszowski, P. (2009). Innovation in the software sector, OECD Publishing, accessed through OECD online bookshop, Retrieved from http://www.oecdbookshop.org, (June 2017).
17. Lundvall, B-A. (1988). Technical Change and Economic theory: Innovation as one interactive process: from user- producer perspectives to the national system of Innovation London, UK : Pinter Publishing Limited, 349- 370.
18. Lundvall, B., Johnson, B., Anderson, S. E., & Balum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building, Research Policy, 31 , 213-231.
19. Mairesse, J., Mohnen, P., & Kremp, E. (2005). The importance of R&D and Innovation for Productivity: A Re-examination in Light of the French Innovation Survey, Annales dÉconomie et de Statistique, 79/80, 487-527.
20. Mosurović, M., & Kutlača Dj. (2011). Organizational design as a driver for firm innovativeness in Serbia, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 24, No. (4), 427-447, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2011.633432, 2011
21. Mulder, M. (2008). From Tradition to Innovation. Skill Needs in the Agri-Food Sector- homepage, Retrieved from http://www.mmulder.nl, (June, 2013).
22. Negassi, S. (2004). R&D co-operation and Innovation in microeconomic study on French frms, Research Policy 33, 365–384. DOI:10.1080/13511610.2011.633432,
23. OECD (2005). Oslo Manual, 3th edition, Paris.
24. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2017). Indicators of Innovative Activities in the Republic of Serbia, 2014-2016, Release number 197.
25. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2015). Indicators of Innovative Activities in the Republic of Serbia, 2012-2014, Release number 276.
26. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2013). Indicators of Innovative Activities in the Republic of Serbia, 2010-2012, Release number 285.
27. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2011). Indicators of Innovative Activities in the Republic of Serbia, 2008-2010, Release number 347.
28. Sternberg, R., Arndt, O. (2001). What Determines the Innovation Behaviour of European Firms?, Economic Geography 77 (4), 364-382.
29. Mosurović Ružičić, M. (2012). Organisation and innovation, Editor: Institute Mihajlo Pupin, Beograd
30. Von Tunzelmann, G.N. (1995). Technology and Industrial Progress: The Foundations of Economic Growth, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, UK.