ENHANCING THE PRODUCTIVITY OF SMALL FARMERS IN CROATIA THROUGH THE AGRICULTURAL FUND FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Lari Hadelan University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Marija Zrilić Master of Engineering in Agribusiness and Rural Development, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Mateja Jež Rogelj University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Magdalena Zrakić Sušac University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Zagreb, Croatia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2204043H

Keywords:

small farmer, support, EAFRD, productivity, Croatia

Abstract

Since 2015, investment subsidies from the EAFRD through the Rural Development Program have been available to farmers in Croatia. The most numerous holdings in Croatia are those with an economic size of up to 8,000 euros, characterized by a low level of productivity due to insufficient production capacity and inadequate machinery They are the intended aid recipients in the sub-measure 6.3. In the three tenders held so far, this sub-measure has been mostly used for the purchase of machinery (62% of all users), which most often includes old tractors inadequate for modern agricultural production. The increase in production capacity with the growth of the Standard Output was used by only 38% of sub-measure users , with a slightly higher share of young farmers and those working in flower production. The conclusion of the paper is that in order to increase the productivity of small farmers, it is necessary to redefine the criteria for approving applications in sub-measure 6.3 in a way that preference is given to farmers committing to activities that will increase their production capacity and Standard Output.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Błażejczyk-Majka, L., Kala, R. & Maciejewski, K. (2012). Productivity and efficiency of large and small field crop farms and mixed farms of the old and new EU regions. Agricultural Economics, 58(2), 61-71.

Craig, B.J., P.G. Pardey, & Roseboom, J. (1997). International Productivity Patterns: Accounting for Input Quality, Infrastructure, and Research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(4), 1064–76.

Davidova, S. & Thomson, K. (2014). Family farming in Europe: challenges and prospects. Brussels: DG for Internal policies, Policy department B: Structural and cohesion policies. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2014/529047/IPOL-AGRI_NT(2014)529047_EN.pdf.

Dhoubhadel, S.P. (2020). Precision Agriculture Technologies and Farm Profitability. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 46(2),256-268. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.303598

Dixon, J., Taniguchi, K. & Wattenbach, (2003). Approaches to assessing the impact of globalisation on African smallholders: household and village economy modelling in proceedings on the “Globalisation and the African Smallholder Study” , a FAO and World Bank working session, Rome: FAO

European Commision (2019). Survey on financial needs and access to finance of EU agricultural enterprises. Retrieved from: https://www.f-compass.eu/sites/default/fles/publications/Survey_on_fnancial_needs_and_access_to_fnance_of_EU_agricultural_enterprises_0.pdf

Eurostat (2016). Farm indicators by agricultural area, type of farm, standard output, legal form and NUTS 2 regions.

Eurostat (2010). Farm structure survey database

Eurostat (2018). Small and large farms in the EU - statistics from the farm structure survey for “The Future of Small Farms”. Research Workshop, Wye College, June 26-29

Frisvold, G., & Ingram, K. (1995). Sources of Agricultural Productivity Growth and Stagnation in Sub-SaharanAfrica. Agricultural Economics 13(1), 51–61.

Gioia, A. (2017). Small farms in Europe: Time for a re-definition. Eco Ruralis, 17, 71-88.

Guiomar, N., Godinho, S., Pinto-Correia, T., Almeida, M., Bartolini, F., Bezak, P., Biro, M., Bjørkhaug, H., Bojnec, Š., Brunori, G. & Corazzin, M. (2018). Typology and distribution of small farms in Europe: Towards a better picture. Land use policy, 75, 784-798.

Hubbard, C. (2009). Small farms in the EU: How small is small? Review of Agricultural Economics 26 (3), 305-331.

Katchova, A.L. & Ahearn, M.C. (2014). Farmland ownership and leasing: Implications for young and beginning farmers. Discussion paper. Retrieved from: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/184725

Lau, L.J., & Yotopoulos, P.A. (1989). The Meta-Production Function Approach to Technological Change in World Agriculture. Journal of Development Economics 31(2), 241–269.

Ministry of Agriculture (2020). Rural Development Programme of the Republic of Croatia for the Period 2014-2020 - Annual implementation report. Retrieved from: https://ruralnirazvoj.hr/fles/Godisnje-izvjesce-o-provedbi-2020.pdf [in Croatian: Ministarstvo poljoprivrede (2020). Program ruralnog razvoja Republike Hrvatske za razdoblje 2014.-2020.- Godišnje izvješće o provedbi]

Nagayets, O. (2005). Small farms: Current Status and Key Trends, Prepared for the Future of Small Farms Research Workshop. Retrieved from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.146.4632&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Narayanan, S. & Gulati, A. (2002). Globalization and the smallholders: A review of issues, approaches and implications. Discussion Paper no.50, Markets and Structural Studies. Retrieved from: http://www.hubrural.org/IMG/pdf/ifpri_smallholder_draft_9july2002.pdf

Official Gazette (89/2011). Ordinance on the system of agricultural accounting data [Narodne novine 89/2011. Pravilnik o sustavu poljoprivrednih knjigovodstvenih podataka]

Nguyen, D. (1979). On Agricultural Productivity Differences among Countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(3), 565–70

Popescu, A., Dinu, T., Stoian, E. & Vlad, I.M. (2017). Trends in agriculture endowment with machinery in Romania 2007-2015. Scientific Papers: Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture & Rural Development, 17(2), 291-299.

Rada, N.E. & Fuglie, K.O. (2019). New perspectives on farm size and productivity. Food Policy, 84, 147-152.

Reimers, M. & Klasen, S. (2013). Revisiting the role of education for agricultural productivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(1), 131-152.

Sarris, A.H., Doucha, T. & Mathijs, E. (1999). Agricultural restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: Implications for competitiveness and rural development. European Review of Agricultural Economics 26(3), 305-329. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/26.3.305

Sims, B. & Kienzle, J. (2016). Making mechanization accessible to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Environments, 3(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments3020011

Solow, R.M. (1988). Growth theory and after. The American Economic Review, 78(3), 307-317.

Subić, J., Kljajić, N. & Jeločnik, M. (2017). Renewable energy sources and irrigation in the function of sustainable agricultural development: economic aspects. Monograph, Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade. [in Croatian: Obnovljivi izvori energije i navodnjavanje u funkciji održivog razvoja poljoprivrede: ekonomski aspekti. Monografja, Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede Beograd.]

Šimić, Z. (2021). Croatia is a cemetery for used tractors from the EU: ‘On average, they are almost 30 years old, Jutarnji list, available at: https://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/hrvatska-je-groblje-za-rabljene-traktore-iz-euprosjecno-su-stari-gotovo-30-godina-15049537 [in Croatian: Šimić, 2021. Hrvatska je groblje za rabljene traktore iz EU: ‘Prosječno su stari gotovo 30 godina, Jutarnji list]

Tauer, L. (1995). Age and farmer productivity. Review of Agricultural Economics, 17(1), 63-69.

Vollrath, D. (2007). Land Distribution and International Agricultural Productivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(1), 202–16.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-23

How to Cite

Hadelan, L., Zrilić, M., Jež Rogelj, M., & Zrakić Sušac, M. (2022). ENHANCING THE PRODUCTIVITY OF SMALL FARMERS IN CROATIA THROUGH THE AGRICULTURAL FUND FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT . Economics of Agriculture, 69(4), 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2204043H

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers