SPECIFICITY OF OPERATION OF GENERAL INTEREST IN THE SERBIAWITH SPECIAL VIEW ON WATER MANAGEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2002537RKeywords:
activities of general interest, specificity activities, users of services, safety of performing activities, supervisionAbstract
In this paper, the author presents the specificities of economic entities performing activities of general interest. In the Republic of Serbia, the state is responsible for the regulating of organized and permanent performance and the development of activities of general interest. In Serbia, the state ensures performing this activity through public companies or capital companies of which it is the sole founder, but it is possible to allow performing the aforementioned activities by entrusting them to a third party. The author conducted a survey related to the necessary conditions for performing activities of general interest by entrusting to a third party a few dozen of economic entities in Serbia. The author considers that, with fulfillment of prescribed conditions, the successful performing activities of general interest can be carried out by privately owned economic entities, since state-owned enterprises have proved to be insufficiently efficient and economical in practice.
Downloads
References
2. Cobrett, A. (2008): Corporate Social Responsibility – Do We Have Good Cause to be Sceptical About it? Griffith Law Review, 17(1), 413-432.
3. Company Law (Official Gazette of RS, No. 36/2011 and 99/2011, 83/2014 – second law, 5/2015, 44/2018 i 95/2018).
4. Decree of Fundamentals of Water Management of the Republic of Serbia (Official Gazette of RS, No. 11/2002).
5. Dufau. P. (1973): Les entreprises publiques, IActualite Juridique Paris, 54-118. 6. Dusmanescu, D., Andrei, J., & Subic, J. (2014). Scenario for implementation of renewable energy sources in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 300-305.
7. Gower, L. (1992): Principles of Modern Company law, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 5-7.
8. Haller, M. (1998): Private, Public and Common Ownership, Analyze & Critic, http//: analyze-und-kritik.net
9. Hamel, J., & Lagarde, G., & Jauffret, A., (1980): Droit commercial, II, Paris, 731-734, 771-776.
10. Ljubojević, G., & Dašić, G. (2018). Boards attributes and their implications on decision-making process. Menadžment u hotelijerstvu i turizmu/ Hotel and Tourism Management, 6(1), 19-29.
11. Mitrović, D. (2017): Osnovi prava, Singidumun University, Belgrade, 208, (in English: Mitrović, D. (2017): Basics of law, Singidumun University, Belgrade, 208). 12. Law on Public Enterprises (Official Gazette of RS, No. 15/2016).
13. Law on Waters (Official Gazette of RS No. 30/2010, 93/2012, 101/2016, 952018 and 95/2018 - other law).
14. Punter, D. (1987/88): Rukovođenje i kontrola nad javnim preduzećem, Bulletin of the Law Faculty of Kragujevac, 21-29, (in English: Punter, D. (1987/88): Management and control of a public enterprise, Bulletin of the Law Faculty of Kragujevac, 21-29).
15. Project Management Institute PMI (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK@Guide) Newton Square.
16. Rajnović, Lj. (2013): Socially responsible business in the function of improving the economic environment in the Republic of Serbia (on Serbian). Association of economists of Belgrade, Belgrade.
17. Rajnović, Lj. & Bukvić, R. (2017): Korporativno upravljanje kao deo poslovne strategije kompanija, Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede Beograd. (in English: Rajnović, Lj. & Bukvić, R. (2017) Corporate governance as part of the companys business strategy of companies, Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade).
18. Vasilescu, I., Cicea, C., Popescu, G., & Andrei, J. (2010). A new methodology for improving the allocation of crops cost production in Romania. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 8(2), 839-842.
19. Vasiljević, M. (1999): Domestic and Comprehensive Law Companies, Association of Lawyers in the Economy of FR Yugoslavia, CIP 347.22, 416 – 417.