• Igor Trandaflović, PhD John Naisbitt University, Faculty of Management Zaječar
  • Vesna Conić, PhD Mining and Metallurgy Institute Bor, Bor
  • Aleksandra Blagojević, PhD John Naisbitt University, Faculty of Management Zaječar, Zaječar


Over the last years, a number of papers have been published on the topic of the influence of different factors on the environmentally conscious behavior of consumers. It can be noted that interest in the influence of demographic factors on this type of behavior in these papers is diminishing. However, the published papers did not provide a unique answer on this topic. The goal of this paper is to examine the correlation between demographic factors and environmentally conscious purchase behavior using the method of meta-analysis and CMA software. In line with this statistical method, studies that examined the influence of demographic factors on environmentally conscious purchase behavior have been taken into account. Among these, only the studies that published Pearson correlation coeffcient have been selected. This way, it was possible to aggregate the samples of these studies and to repeat the testing of the hypothesis that demographic factors influence the environmentally conscious purchase behavior. Results of this analysis provide some proof of this correlation, but also call for an expanded research to deal with this topic in more details.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Bartolucci, A. (2009): Opis i tumačenje metodoloških i statističkih tehnika u metaanalizama, Biochemia Medica, vol.19, no. 2, pp. 127-136.
2. Blocker, T. J., Lee, E. D. (1997): Gender and Environmentalism: Results from the 1993 General Social Survey, Social Science Quarterly, University of Texas Press, vol. 78, issue 4, pp. 841-858.
3. Brandongaille (2015): 17 Important Organic Food Consumption Statistics, (available at:
4. Cerjak, M., Mesić, Ž., Kopić, M., Kovačić, D., Markovina, J. (2010): What motivates consumers to buy organic food – comparison of Croatia, Bosnia Herzegovina and Slovenia, Journal of Food Products Marketing, Jul-Sep, vol. 16 issue 3, pp. 278-292.
5. Chan, R. Y. (2001): Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior, Psychology & Marketing, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 389–413.
6. Diamantopoulos, A. Schlegelmilch, B., Sinkovics, R., Bohlen, G. (2003): Can sociodemographics still play a role in profling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation, Journal of Business Research, vol.56, pp. 465 – 480.
7. Ekins, P. (1992): Limits to growth’ and ‘sustainable development’: grappling with ecological realities, Ecological Economics, vol. 8, pp. 269-288, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam.
8. Euractiv (2013): Europeans ‘confused by green claims’: Survey (available at:
9. Florenthal, B., Arling, P. (2011): Do Green Lifestyle Consumers Appreciate Low Involvement Green Products?, Marketing Management Journal, vol. 21, issue 2, pp. 35 - 45.
10.Glass, G. (1976): Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research, American Educational Research Association, vol. 5, issue 10, pp. 3-8.
11.Ilić, I. (2009): Meta-analiza, Acta Medica Medianae, vol.48, pp. 28-31.
12.Kilbourne, W. (1998): Green Marketing: A Theoretical Perspective, Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 14, issue 6, pp. 641-655.
13.Kim, Y., Choi, S. M. (2005): Green Marketing: An Attitudinal and Behavioral Analysis of Indian Consumers, Global Business Review, vol. 5, no.2, pp. 187-205.
14.Kotler, P. (2011): Reinventing Marketing to Manage the Environmental Imperative, Journal of Marketing, vol. 75 (July), pp.132–135. American Marketing Association ISSN: 0022-2429 (print), 1547-7185 (electronic).
15.Lovrić, M. (2009): Osnovi statistike, p. 261, Ekonomski fakultet, Univerzitet u Kragujevcu.
16.Marinković, V., Obradović, Lj., Bugarin, M., Stojanović, G. (2014): The imapct of polluted wastewater on water quality of the Bor river and water quality surrounding groundwater, Mining & Metallurgy Engineering Bor, no. 3, pp.33-40.
17.McEachern M. G., McClean, P. (2002): Organic purchasing motivations and attitudes: are they ethical?, International Journal of Consumer Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, June, p. 85.
18.Morris, S. (2008): Book Review: Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Organizational Research Methods, vol. 11, no. 1, January, pp.184-187.
19.Mostafa, M. (2007): Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behavior: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude, International Journal of Consumer Studies, vol. 31, issue 3, May, pp. 220–229.
20.Nikolić, S. R., Vuković, P., Grujić, B. (2017): Measures to Support the Development of Organic Farming in the EU and Serbia, Economics of Agriculture vol. 1/2017, pp. 323-337.
21.NIST SEMATECH (2017): NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, (available at:
22.Ostman, R. E., Parker, J. L. (1987): Impact of Education, Age, Newspapers, and Television on Environmental Knowledge, Concerns, and Behaviors, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 19, issue 1, pp. 3-9.
23.Polonsky, M. J. (1994): A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, vol. 10, no. 3. pp. 29-46
24.Roberts, J. A., Straughan, R. D. (1999): Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium, Journal of Consumer Marketing, vol. 16, pp. 558-575.
25.Schlegelmilch, B., Bohlen, B., Diamantopoulos, A.(1996): The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness, European Journal of Marketing, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 35-55.
26.Van Liere, K., Dunlap, R. (1981): The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 181-197.
27.Vehapi, S., Dolićanin, E. (2016): Consumer Behaviour on Organic Food: Evidence from the Republic of Serbia. Economics of Agriculture, vol. 3, pp.871-889
28.Ward, S. (2017): Stick to the Defnition and Green Marketing Can Be Very Powerful, The Balance (available at:
29.WCED (1986): Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development (available at:
30.Webster, F. E. (1975): Determining the Characteristics of the Socially Conscious Consumer, The Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 2, December, pp. 188-196.
31.Weigel, H. R. (1977): Ideological and Demographic Correlates of Proecologicaly Behaviour, The Journal of Social Psychology, vol.103, pp. 39-47.
How to Cite
TRANDAFLOVIĆ, Igor; CONIĆ, Vesna; BLAGOJEVIĆ, Aleksandra. IMPACT OF DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS ON ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS PURCHASE BEHAVIOR. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 64, n. 4, p. 1365-1377, dec. 2017. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 28 sep. 2020. doi:
Original scientific papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)