ENVIRONMENT AND LEGAL PROTECTION OF ANIMALS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

  • Zdravko Petrović, PhD , Faculty of Law, Novi Beograd
  • Vojislav Jović, PhD Faculty of Law, Novi Beograd
  • Dragan Manojlović, PhD Faculty of Law, Novi Beograd

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the application of scientifc methods of animal protection in the legal legislation of the Republic of Serbia, through assaults on the environment. Apart from the introductory defnition of the subject matter, normative developments of all legal norms protecting the animal rights have been described as well. From the results of the research which were obtained through the application of legal and dogmatic scientifc methods, content analysis, quantitative and qualitative description and correlation, it can be concluded on the grounds of several fndings as follows: contemporary legal theory and legislation of the Republic of Serbia do not deny the protection of animal rights; within the framework of codifcation of the Serbian substantive criminal law which was performed in 2005, the criminal and legal norms providing legal animal protection have not gain their importance yet, primarily since they are classifed under the environmental offences and not under an independent chapter of the criminal law which will be justifed. The fndings indicate that the loss of crime in the offences against life, physical integrity and welfare of animals make more than a half in the total number of criminal charges against the suspect charged with committing offences against animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Baumans, V.(2004). Use of animals in experimental research: an ethical dilemma? Review Gene Therapy, Stockholm, 11, S64-S66.
2. Beirne, P. (2004). From Animal Abuse to Interhuman Violence? A Critical Review of the Progression Thesis, Society and Animals - Journal of Humane – Animal Studies, Leiden, 49.
3. Bilten broj 578,588. (2014). Republički zavod za statistiku, Beograd, ISSN 0354 3641. (eng. l. Bulletin number 578, 588 (2014). Republican Bureau of Statistics, Belgrade).
4. Bilten broj 603. (2015). Republički zavod za statistiku, Beograd, ISSN 0354-3641. (eng. l. Bulletin number 603. (2015). Republican Bureau of Statistics, Belgrade).
5. Bilten broj 617. (2016). Republički zavod za statistiku, Beograd, ISSN 0354-3641. (eng. l. Bulletin no. 617. Republican Bureau of Statistics, Belgrade.
6. Blessing, J., Marshall, J., Balcombe, S.(2010). Humane killing of fshes for scientifc research: a comparison of two methods Journal of Fish Biology, Volume 76, Issue 10, 2571–2577.
7. Broom, D. (1991). Animal welfare: Concepts and measurement. Anim. J., Cambridge Vol.16: 4167-4175.
8. Camm, T., Bowles, D.(2000). Animal welfare and the treaty of Rome – legal analysis of the protocol on animal welfare and welfare standards in the European Union, Journal of Environmental Law, Volume 12, Issue 2, 197-205.
9. Carenzi, C., Verga, M. (2007). Animal welfare: Review of the scientifc concept and defnition, Scientifc Association of Animal Poduction, pp. 25, by source: Hughes, B. O. (1976). Behaviour as index of welfare,1005-1018 in Proc. 5th Eur. Poultry Conf., Malta.
10. Encyclopaedia of the social sciences, Macmillan Co., New York, Volume XIII, 1933, 531. 11. Feinberg, J. (2012). Ethical Theory: An Anthology, The rights of animals and unborn generations.Second Edition, Edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, WileyBackwell.ISBN 978-0.470-761160-3.
12. Huss Rebecca, J. (2004). Valuation in Veterinary Malpractice. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Chicago,Vol. 35, No. 2, 2004.
13. Lazarević, Lj. (2006). Komentar krivičnog zakonika Republike Srbije, Savremena administracija, Beograd, 695.
14. Mason, G., Latham, N. (2004). Animal Welfare, Can’t stop, won’t stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator? Vol 13 (Suppl), S57-S69.
15. McGrath, J., Drummond, G., McLachlan, E., Kilkenn, and Wainwright, C. (2010). Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines, British Journal Pharmacological, UK, Volume 160, Issue 7, 1573–1576.
16. Nielsen, K. (2001). Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.
17. Petrović, M., Simić, I. (1085).Praktična primena Krivičnog zakona Republike Srbije, “Napredak”, Aranđelovac, 174.
18. Rollin, B. (1993). Animal welfare, science and value. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. Printed in the Netherland, Vol. 6: 44-50, ISSN:1187-7863.
19. Srzentić, N., Lazarević, Lj., Đorđević, M., Stajić, A., i Kraus, B. (1991). Komentar Krivičnog zakona Republike Srbije, Savremena adminstracija, Beograd, 444-445.
20. Sutherlandu, H., Cressey, R., Luckenbill, F. (1992). Principles of Criminology, eleventh edition, Maryland, ISBN 0-930390-69-5.
21. Webster, J. (2006). Animal sentience and animal welfare: What is it to them and what is it to us? Appl. Anim. Behav.100: 1. Volume 100, Issues 1-2, Langford, p. 1–3.
22. Directive 86/609/EEC - J. Eur. Commun. Legal Spec. (1986). Reconciliation of Legal and Administrative Regulations of the Member Countries for the Protection of Animals used for Studies. Directive 86/609/EEC - J. Eur. Commun. Legal Spec., 1986.
23. Krivični zakonik (2013). (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 85/2005, 88/2005, 107/2005, 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012 и 104/2013), Beograd. (eng. L.Criminal Code (2013). (“Offcial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 85/2005, 88/2005, 107/2005, 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012 and 104/2013), Belgrade.)
24. Pravilnik o uslovima dobrobiti životinja u smislu prostora za životinje, prostorije i opremu u objektima u kojima se čuvaju i uzgajaju životinje koje se stavljaju u promet za proizvodne svrhe, način držanja, odvođenja i transporta odreženih životinjskih vrsta i kategorija, kao i vođenje evidencije životinja (2014). (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 6/2010 и 57/2014), Beograd. (eng. l. Rulebook on animal welfare conditions in terms of space for animals, premises and equipment in facilities in which animals are placed and marketed for production purposes, the manner of keeping, transporting and transporting animal species and categories as well as keeping records of animals (2014), («Offcial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia», No. 6/2010 and 57/2014), Belgrade.)
25. Pravilnik o proglašenju i zaštiti strogo zaštićenih divljih vrsta biljaka, životinja i gljiva (2010). (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 5/2010), Izvod iz Aneksa I i Aneksa II, Beograd. (eng. l. Ordinance on the designation and protection of strictly protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi (2010). (“Offcial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 5/2010), Excerpt from Annex I and Annex II, Belgrade).
26. Ustav Republike Srbije (2006). (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 98/2006), Beograd, Srbija. (eng. l. Constitution of the Republic of Serbia (2006). (“Offcial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 98/2006), Belgrade, Serbia).
27. Zakon o zaštiti životne sredine (2009). (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 135/2004, 36/2009, 36/2009 - dr. Zakon 72/2009 - dr. Zakon i 43/2011. - Odluka Ustavnog suda), Beograd. (eng. l. Law on Environmental Protection (2009). (“Offcial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 135/2004, 36/2009, 36/2009 - other Law 72/2009 - other Law and 43/2011 - Decision of the Constitutional Court), Belgrade.
28. Zakon o trgovini (2010). („Službeni glasnik RS“, br. 53/2010 i 10/2013), Beograd. (egl. l. Law on Trade (2010). (“Offcial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 53/2010 and 10/2013) Belgrade.
29. Zakon o lovstvu (2010). („Službeni glasnik RS“, br. 18/2010) Beograd, Srbija. (egl. L. Law on Hunting (2010). (“Offcial Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 18/2010) Belgrade.
Published
2018-01-20
How to Cite
PETROVIĆ, Zdravko; JOVIĆ, Vojislav; MANOJLOVIĆ, Dragan. ENVIRONMENT AND LEGAL PROTECTION OF ANIMALS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 65, n. 1, p. 293-305, jan. 2018. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <http://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/23>. Date accessed: 18 oct. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1801293P.