• Uroš Ćemalović, Ph.D. University John Naisbitt, Faculty of Law, Public Administration and Security


The transformation of Serbian national legislation in the process of country’s accession to the European Union (EU) is a complex phenomenon and its scope and depth can signifcantly vary in different felds. Moreover, the constant and rapid development of European environmental law makes its reception in the internal law even more diffcult. The objective of this paper is to provide, using mainly the comparative legal method, a global analysis of Serbian environmental legislation in the light of its harmonization with EU acquis, without treating the issues of technical standards and questions related to the negotiation framework within the Chapter 27. It will be argued that the progressive transformation of national legal standards under the influence of EU law is signifcant, but still remains far from reaching its effective implementation.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Barker, J., Tingey, D. ed. (1992): Air Pollution Effects on Biodiversity, Springer, New York, U.S.A.
2. Bjarnason, M. (2010): The Political Economy of Joining the European Union: Iceland’s Position at the Beginning of the 21st Century, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
3. Boiret, A. (2012): Environmental Governance in France, in Book – Environmental Protection in Multi-Layered Systems – Comparative Lessons from the Water Sector, ed. Alberton, M., Palermo, F., ch. no. 8, pp. 189-208, Nijhoff, Leiden, the Netherlands.
4. Ćemalović, U. (2015): Framework for the Approximation of National Legal Systems with European Union’s Acquis: From a Vague Defnition to Jurisprudential Implementation, Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, vol. 11, pp. 241- 258, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia (available at: http://cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/200).
5. Ellison, D. (2010): Addressing Adaptation in the EU Policy Framework, in Book – Developing Adaptation Policy and Practice in Europe: Multi-level Governance of Climate Change, ed. Keskitalo, C., ch. no. 2, pp. 39-96, Springer, New York, U.S.A.
6. Freeman, C. (1996): Local Government and Emerging Models of Participation in the Local Agenda 21 Process, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 65-78, Routledge, London, United Kingdom (available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640569612679).
7. Hendry, S. (2015): Frameworks for Water Law Reform, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
8. Megret, F. (2013): The Case for a General International Crime Against the Environment, in Book – Sustainable Development, International Criminal Justice and Treaty Implementation, ed. Jodoin S., Cordonier Segger M-C., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
9. Nilsson, A. ed. (1999): Social Scientists on Environmental Policy, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark.
10. Oliver, P. (2013): Access to Information and to Justice in EU Environmental Law: The Aarhus Convention, Fordham International Law Journal, vol. Fordham University School of Law, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1423-1467, New Your, United States of America (available at: http://fordhamilj.org/articles/access-to-information-andto-justice-in-eu-environmental-law-the-aarhus-convention).
11. Orlando, E. (2016): The Evolution of EU Policy and Law in the Environmental Field: Achievements and Current Challenges, in Book – The EU, the US and Global Climate Governance, ed. Bakker C., Francioni, F., ch. no. 3, pp. 61-80, Routledge, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
12. Pain, N. (2007): Access to Environmental Justice in the South West Pacifc, in Book – Access to Environmental Justice – A Comparative Study, ed. Andrew Harding, ch. no. 9, pp. 243-270, Nijhoff, Leiden, the Netherlands.
13. Pereira, R. (2015): Environmental Criminal Liability and Enforcement in European and International Law, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, the Netherlands.
14. Peeters, M., Uylenburg, R., ed. (2014): EU Environmental Legislation – Legal Perspectives on Regulatory Strategies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.
15. Selin, H., Van Deveer, S. (2015): European Union and Environmental Governance, Routledge, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
16. Shen, T. (1999): Industrial Pollution Prevention, Springier, Berlin, Germany.
17. Slezakova, K., Reis, A., Pereira, C., Alvim-Ferraz, C. (2007): Influence of Traffc on the Elemental Composition of PM10 and PM2.5 in Oporto Region, in Book – Air 18. Pollution XV, ed. Borrego, Brebbia, ch. no. 1, pp. 59-70, WIT Press, Southampton, United Kingdom.
18. Stančić, M. (2002): Croatia on its Way Towards the EU, Nomos, Baden-Baden, Germany.
19. Vermeulen, G., De Bondt, W., Ryckman, C. (2012): Liability of Legal Persons for Offences in the EU, Maklu Publishers, Antwerpen, Belgium.
20. Wilhelmsson, T. (2014): Free Movement of Legal Sources: The Use of Foreign Sources in Private Law in Europe, in Book – Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation – Liber Amicorum for Hans Micklitz, ed. Kai Purnhagen, Peter Rott, ch. no. 10, pp. 185-206, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
21. Serbia 2014 Progress Report, European Commission (2014), (available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2014/20140108-serbia-progressreport_en.pdf).
22. Slovak Republic – A Strategy for Growth and European Integration (1998), A World Bank Country Study, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, U.S.A. (available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1998/04/693632/slovak-republic-strategy-growth-europeanintegration)
How to Cite
ĆEMALOVIĆ, Uroš. HARMONISATION OF SERBIAN NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM WITH EUROPEAN UNION ACQUIS – THE CASE OF ENVIRONMENT. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 63, n. 3, p. 891-904, aug. 2016. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <http://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/204>. Date accessed: 24 sep. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1603891C.