The knowledge age greatly shaped society’s understanding of what goes beyond the agribusiness and sharply raised the question of farmers’ responsibilities on the way they do farming in relation to the payments they receive as public support. Therefore the new rural prosperity drivers in knowledge age calls for the new principles of European Union support distribution for agriculture and rural development. The aim of this research is to explore future drivers of rural prosperity based on knowledge society measures. It is argued, that the upcoming European Union rural prosperity is guided by knowledge philosophy encompassing the nexus among ‘innovating’, ‘networking’ and ‘giving back’ to society. Original empirical data, collected in Lithuanian in 2017, explores farmers’ attitudes towards listed knowledge society measures in relation to farm size and other relevant characteristics. Research findings suggest more promising directions for agriculture and rural development that contributes better for rural prosperity in knowledge age.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Agriculture and Food sector in Lithuania in 2015 (2016). Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics. Vilnius, 2016.
2. Agriculture and Food sector in Lithuania in 2016 (2017). Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics. Vilnius, 2017.
3. Boyd, B., Henning, N., Reyna, E., Wang, D., Welch, M., & Hoffman, A. J. (2017). Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Routledge.
4. Carroll, A. B., & Brown, J. A. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Current Concepts, Research, and Issues. In Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 39-69). Emerald Publishing Limited.
5. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Wright, M. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310-318.
6. Duh, E. S., & Kos, A. (2016, October). Fablabs as drivers for open innovation band co-creation to foster rural development. In Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things (IIKI), 2016 International Conference on (pp. 214-216). IEEE.
7. Dunne, T. C., Aaron, J. R., McDowell, W. C., Urban, D. J., & Geho, P. R. (2016). The impact of leadership on small business innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4876-4881.
8. Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 1-14.
9. Ethical CSR Leadership: Passion or Fashion. International Journal of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility (IJSECSR), 2(2), 1-22.
10. European Commision (2017). MFF 2014-2020. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressrelease_IP-13-1096_en.htm
11. European Commision (2018). CAP Expenditure and CAP Reform Path. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/cap-funding/pdf/capspending-09-2018_en.pdf
12. Fink, M., Lang, R., & Richter, R. (2017). Social entrepreneurship in marginalised rural Europe: towards evidence-based policy for enhanced social innovation. Regions Magazine, 306(1), 6-10.
13. Friedrich von den Eichen, S., Freiling, J., & Matzler, K. (2015). Why business model innovations fail. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(6), 29-38.
14. Hardingham, Eileen, Jaromír Vrbka, Tomas Kliestik, and Jana Kliestikova (2018). Will Cognitive Technology-Driven Automation Lead to Economic Growth?, Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 6(4): 13–18.
15. Horlings, L. G., & Marsden, T. K. (2014). Exploring the ‘New Rural Paradigm’ in Europe: Eco-economic strategies as a counterforce to the global competitiveness agenda. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), 4-20.
16. Jentsch, B. (2017). Young people in rural areas of Europe. Taylor & Francis.
17. Kusano, S., Wright, M., & Conger, A. (2016). Development and assessment of self-agency, and the ability to innovate and take risks. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching Occasional Paper, 34.
18. Lambrecht, E., Taragola, N., Kühne, B., Crivits, M., & Gellynck, X. (2015). Networking and innovation within the ornamental plant sector. Agricultural and Food Economics, 3(1), 10.
19. Lavesson, N. (2017). When and how does commuting to cities influence rural employment growth?. Journal of Regional Science, 57(4), 631-654.
20. Liu, Y., & Li, Y. (2017). Revitalize the world’s countryside. Nature News, 548(7667), 275.
21. Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., Cormier, L., & Madureira, T. (2015). Urban residents’ beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 56-64.
22. Mather, A. S., Hill, G., & Nijnik, M. (2006). Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorization? Journal of Rural Studies, 22(4), 441-455.
23. Mazur-Wierzbicka, E. (2015). The application of corporate social responsibility in European agriculture. Miscellanea Geographica. Vol. 19. No. 1: 19–23.
24. Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks—a new paradigm of rural development?. Journal of rural studies, 16(4), 407-419.
25. Neary, B., Horák, J., Kovacova, M., & Valaskova, K. (2018). The Future of Work: Disruptive Business Practices, Technology-Driven Economic Growth, and Computer-Induced Job Displacement, Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 6(4): 19–24.
26. Nica, E., Manole, C., & Stan, C. I. (2018). A Laborless Society? How Highly Automated Environments and Breakthroughs in Artificial Intelligence Bring About Innovative Kinds of Skills and Employment Disruptions, Altering the Nature of Business Process and Affecting the Path of Economic Growth. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 6(4): 25–30.
27. Neumeier, S. (2017). Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success. The geographical journal, 183(1), 34-46.
28. Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International journal of management reviews, 5(3-4), 137-168.
29. Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International journal of management reviews, 5(3-4), 137-168.
30. Reimers-Hild, C. I., & Dye, A. (2015). How to Grow Your Rural Business with Purpose and Meaning.
31. Reimers-Hild, C., & Dye, A. (2015). Become a Future-Focused Leader: Use Three Megatrends to Grow Your Rural Business.
32. Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360-371.
33. Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility. Routledge.
34. Specht, K., Zoll, F., & Siebert, R. (2016). Application and evaluation of a participatory “open innovation” approach (ROIR): The case of introducing zeroacreage farming in Berlin. Landscape and Urban Planning, 151, 45-54.
35. Sumane, S., Kunda, I., Knickel, K., Strauss, A., Tisenkopfs, T., Des, I., ... & Ashkenazy, A. (2017). Local and farmers’ knowledge matters! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture. J. Rural Stud. In press, 1-10. Lee-Davies, L. (2017).
36. Vaccaro, I. G., Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2012). Management innovation and leadership: The moderating role of organizational size. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 28-51.
37. Vidickiene, D., Melnikiene, R. (2014). Evolution of rural policy: monograph. – Vilnius: Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics. 272 p. ISBN 978-9955-481- 44-7.
38. Vochozka, M., Kliestik, T., Kliestikova, J., & Sion, G. (2018). Participating in a highly automated society: how artificial intelligence disrupts the job market. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 13(4): 57–62.
39. Whitby, M. C., & Willis, K. G. (2017). Rural resource development: an economic approach. Routledge.
How to Cite
VILKE, Rita; GEDMINAITE-RAUDONE, Zivile; CVIJANOVĆ, Drago. FUTURE DRIVERS OF RURAL PROSPERITY IN KNOWLEDGE AGE: LITHUANIAN CASE. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 66, n. 1, p. 143-157, mar. 2019. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <http://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/1362>. Date accessed: 22 oct. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1901143V.