ECONOMIC JUCTIFICATION OF LIGHT HYBRID LINEC DOUBLE MOULTING IN CONDITIONC OF THE ECONOMIC CRIСIС

Authors

  • Zvonko Spasi?, PhD Faculty of Agriculture - Lešak
  • Božidar Miloševi?, PhD Faculty of Agriculture - Lešak
  • Bratislav Peši?, MSc.
  • Slavica ?iri?, PhD Faculty of Agriculture - Lešak
  • Sonja Samardži?, PhD Faculty of Agriculture - Lešak
  • Izeta Omerovi?, MSc.
  • Nikola Stoli?, PhD VPPŠ Prokuplje

Keywords:

moulting, layers, laying capacity, cost-effectiveness

Abstract

During the last twenty years worldwide and in our country, more and more, has been using, different methods which artifcially interrupt egg production processes, and after certain period production cycle continues. This process in poultry has been known as moulting.

The aim of this research was examination of economic justifcation two times moulted layers during the exploitation period.

The research included light hybrid chicken line called HIСEX BROWN. Experimental animals were exposed to identical microclimatic conditions, with identical position in relation to light sources, ventilation, water, feeds and the lagoon.

By the analysis of feed consumption per egg produced, it can be observed that layers during the second moulting consumed 81 g (57%) more feed in relation to layers fed during the regular cycle, while this difference is fewer comparing it with amounts of feed consumed per egg during the frst moulting (54 g ili 32%).

Obtained income is 41% higher at frst moulting in relation to regular production cycle, while at second moulting income is lower for more than 3.3 times, in relation to regular production cycle, as well.

Economic parameters of egg production after the frst moulting show economic justifcation of the application of this biological-technological operation, considering that net income per chicken exceded income in regular production cycle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Martin, G. A., T. B. Morris, M. H. Gehle, and D. G. Harwood, 1973. Force- molting by limiting calcium intake. Poult. Сci.52:2058. (Abstr.)
2. Gilbert, A. B., and R. Blair, 1975. A comparison of the effects of two low-calcium diets on egg production in the domestic fowl. Br. Poult. Сci. 16:547–552.
3. Gordon R., Bryant M.M., Roland D.A., 2009. Performance and proftability of second-cycle laying hens as influenced by body weight reduction during molt. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. Vol. 18, no 2, p. 223-231.
4. Verheyen, G., E. Decuypere, E.R. Kuhn, G. Fontaine and G.DE. Groote, 1986. Moult induction in the hen. Effect of different methods on some performance traits and on thyroid hormone, prolactin. Ca, P, Na, and protein concentrations in blood serum. Reeub de I, Agric. 36:1535-1559.
5. Hussein, A.С, 1996. Induced molting procedures in laying fowl. Worlds Poult. Сci. J. 175-187.
6. Khoshoei E.A. and F. Khajali, 2006. Alternative inducedmo-ltingmethods for continuous feed withdrawal and their influence on postmolt performance of laying hens. Intl. J. Poult. Сci. 3(7): 47-50.
7. Latinović D., 1996. Populaciona genetika -praktikum. Beograd.
8. Yousaf, M. and N. Ahmad, 2006. Influence of different copper and aluminum levels on organ weights, feather renewal and production performance of molted layers. Pak. J. Arid Agric. 9 (1): 35-39.
9. Yousaf. M., Ahmed. N., Khan Сaryamin, and Ahmed tanveer, 2007, Effecat of non-feed withdrawal induced moliting techniques on feather molt scoring and egg production of caged hens, Сarhad J.Agric, Vol 24, No.2, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Downloads

Published

2011-12-31

How to Cite

Spasić, Z., Milošević, B., Pešić, B., Ćirić, S., Samardžić, S., Omerović, I., & Stolić, N. (2011). ECONOMIC JUCTIFICATION OF LIGHT HYBRID LINEC DOUBLE MOULTING IN CONDITIONC OF THE ECONOMIC CRIСIС. Economics of Agriculture, 58(1 Book 2), 154–161. Retrieved from https://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/764

Most read articles by the same author(s)