THE INFLUENCE OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ON THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

Authors

  • Adam Kagan Economics of Farm Holdings Department, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, National Research Institute, Warsaw

Keywords:

natural environment, agricultural holding, synthetic ratio, diagnostics features, IPAT equation

Abstract

Agriculture is the production field, which depends on the condition of the natural environment because it uses the natural processes of growth and reproduction of living organisms. The agriculture itself also affects the environment. The effects of this interaction, both positive and negative, are additionally shaped by the social, political, economic, technical and technological surroundings. The factors determining the agricultures impact on a macro scale on the environment may, however, by brought down and subordinated to the main constituents, namely: the size of human population, demand for agricultural raw materials, the applied production technology (classical IPAT equation) and agro-climatic conditions. Based on the available forecasts and materials the potential directions and effects of constituents of the equation were analysed at the global level. However, establishing the environmental performance of a given agricultural holding and agriculture at the local level requires a different methodological approach. The article presents the method for measuring an agricultural holdings individual impact on the environment in the form of one indicator synthetic measure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Agrawala, S., Kramer, M. A., Prudent-Richard, G., Sainsbury, M. (2010): Incorporating climate change impacts and adaptation in Environmental Impact Assessments: Opportunities and Challenges, OECD Publishing, OECD Environmental Working Paper, no. 24, pg. 1-37.
2. Alexandratos, N. (2009): World food and agriculture to 2030/2050: Highlights and views from mid-2009, Paper for the Expert Meeting on "How to Feed the World in 2050", FAO, Rome, 24-26 June 2009, (accessed on May 5. 2012), pg. 1-32.
3. Alston, J. I. M., Beddow, J. M., Pardey, P. G. (2009): Mendel versus Malthus: research, productivity and food prices in the long run, Staff Papers, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics, no. 53400, www.econpapers.repec.org/ paper/agsumaesp/53400.htm (accessed on Jun 16. 2012), pg. 1-42.
4. Bruinsma, J. (2009): The resource outlook to 2050: By how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050?, Paper for the Expert Meeting on "How to Feed the World in 2050", FAO, Rome, 24-26 June 2009, (accessed on January 30 2012), pg. 1-33.
5. Bruinsma, J. (ed.) (2003): World agriculture: towards 2015/2030 An FAO perspective, Earthscan Publications Ltd, FAO London, pg. 232-262.
6. Chertow, M. R. (2000): The IPAT Equation and Its Variants, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 4, issue 4, pg. 13-29.
7. Diaz-Balteiro, L., Romero, C. (2004): In search of a natural systems sustainability index, Ecological Economic, vol. 49, issue 3, pg. 401-405.
8. Dietz, T., Rosa, E.A., York, R. (2007): Driving the human ecological footprint, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 5, issue 1, pg. 13-18.
9. Fan, Y., Liu, L. C., Wu, G., Wie, Y. M. (2006): Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model, Environ Impact Assess, vol. 26, no. 4, pg. 377–395.
10.FAO (November 2010): Cereals, Food Outlook, Global Market Analysis, www.fao.org/docrep/013/al969e/al969e00.pdf (accessed on March 8. 2012), pg. 1-117.
11. Goodlass, G., Halberg, N., Verschuur, G. (2003): Input output accounting systems in the European community /an appraisal of their usefulness in raising awareness of environmental problems, European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 20, issue 1-2, pg. 17-24.
12.Institution of Mechanical Engineers (January 2011): Population: one planet, too many people? Institution of Mechanical Engineers, UK, London 2011, pg.1-46.
13.Jan, P., Dux, D., Lips, M., Alig, M., Dumondel, M. (2012): On the link between economic and environmental performance of Swiss dairy farms of the alpine area, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 17, issue 6, pg. 706-719.
14.Kerselaers, E., Rogge, E., Dessein, J., Lauwers, L., Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011): Prioritising land to be preserved for agriculture: A context-specifc value tree, Land Use Policy, vol. 28, issue 1, pg. 219–226.
15.Kinzig, A. P., Ryan, P., Etienne, M., Allison, H., Elmqvist, T., Walker, B. H. (2006): Resilience and regime shifts: assessing cascading effects, Ecology and Society, vol. 11, no. 1, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art20/
16.Kuosmanen, T., Kuosmanen, N. (2009): How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might), Ecological Economics, vol. 69, issue 2, pg. 235–243.
17.Lichtenberg, E., Shortle, J., Wilen, J., Zilberman, D. (2010): Natural Resource Economics and Conservation: Contributions of Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Economists, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 92, no. 2, pg. 469-486.
18.Mayer, A. L. (2008): Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems, Environment International, vol. 34, issue 2, pg. 277–291.
19.Mitchell, R. B. (2012): Technology Is Not Enough: Climate Change, Population, Affluence and Consumption, The Journal of Environment & Development, vol. 21, no. 1, pg. 24-27.
20.Nigel, J. (2006): Concepts of efficiency in ecological economics: Sisyphus and the decision maker, Ecological Economic, vol. 56, issue 3, pg. 359-372.
21.OECD (2001): Environmental Indicators for Agriculture. Methods and Results. Executive Summary, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, pg. 22-23.
22.OECD (2008): Environmental performance of Agriculture in OECD countries since 1990, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, pg. 102-106.
23.OECD (2010):Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics, OECD Factbook 2010, OECD Publishing, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-factbook-2010/population-growth-rates-table_factbook-2010-table4-en;jsessionid=54cobv95blugq.delta (accessed on January 11. 2012).
24.Pender, J. L. (1998): Population growth, agricultural intensification, induced innovation and natural resource sustainability: An application of neoclassical growth theory, Agricultural Economics, vol. 19, issue 1-2, pg. 99-112.
25.Pretty, J. (2008): Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, vol. 363, no. 1491, pg. 447-465.
26.Ruggeri, J. (2009): Government investment in natural capital, Ecological Economic, vol. 68, issue 6, pg. 1723-1739.
27.Runowski, H., Zietara, W. (2011): Future Role of Agriculture in Multifunctional Development of Rural Areas, Applied: Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, vol. 5, no. 1-2, pg. 29-37.
28.Sachs, J. D. (2008): Common Wealth: Economics for a Crowded Planet, Penguin Press, New York, USA, pg. 31-33.
29.Schulze, P. C. (2002): I=PBAT, Ecological Economics, vol. 40, issue 2, pg. 149-150.
30.Smith, P., Gregory, P. J., Van Vuuren, D., Obersteiner, M., Havlík, P., Rounsevell, M., Woods, J., Stehfest, E., Bellarby, J. (2010): Competition for land, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 365, no. 1554, pg. 2941-2957.
31.Stiglitz, E. J. (2000): Economics of the Public Sector, Third Edition, W. W. Norton & Company, pg. 127-141.
32.Van der Werf, H. M. G., Petit, J. (2002): Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 93, issue 1-3, pg. 131-145.
33.Zegar, J. (2007): Przesłanki nowej ekonomiki rolnictwa, [The premise of the new economics of agriculture], IERiGŻ-PiB, Zagadnienie Ekonomiki Rolnej, nr. 2, pg. 5-27.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-31

How to Cite

Kagan, A. (2013). THE INFLUENCE OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ON THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT. Economics of Agriculture, 60(1), 123–140. Retrieved from https://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/514