ACTIVATION OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL AREAS

Julia Doitchinova; Zornitsa Stoyanova

doi:10.5937/ekoPolj1403661D

Authors

Julia Doitchinova, PhD University of National and World Economy, Sofia
Zornitsa Stoyanova, PhD University of National and World Economy, Sofia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1403661D

Keywords:

LEADER, local action group (LAG), rural development, rural development program.

Abstract

The article examines the main problems encountered during the development of area-based partnerships in rural Bulgaria. These partnerships were created to enhance endogenous development in rural areas and have been rapidly adopted due to the requirement to run the European Union LEADER type program. Purpose of the article is to assess the practice and the problems of implementation of the LEADER approach in Bulgaria for the frst membership program period and to offer recommendations to increase the motivation of local communities for the development and implementation of local development strategies.

Conclusions and recommendations for improving the practice of implementation of the Leader approach is based on the results of the survey and analysis of the documents of local action groups and the Program for Rural Development, realized within a research project by a team from the University of National and World Economy Sofa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Biderman, A., Kazior, B., Serafn, R., Szmigielski, P. (2004): Building partnership. A practical manual, Polish Environmental Partnership Foundation, Kraków, Poland.
2. Chevalier, P., Maurel, M. (2010): Policy Transfer of the Local Development Model. The Leader Program Implementation in Central European countries, Regional Studies Association, Annual International Conference, May 2010, Pécs, Hungary.
3. Dargan, L. Shucksmith, M. (2008): LEADER and innovation, Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 48, pp. 271–294.
4. Doitchinova, J., Miteva, A., Stoyanova, Z. (2012): The Process of creating local action group in Bulgaria – problems and prospects, Scientifc Annals of the "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iasi, Economic Sciences Section, Vol. 59, No. 2.
5. Doitchinova, J., Kanchev, I., Miteva, A., Stoyanova, Z., Stanimirova, M., Jecheva, I., Tochkova, E. (2013): Possibilities of LEADER approach for development of viable rural areas and protection of natural recourses, publ. Stopanstvo, Sofa.
6. EC (2013): Rural Development in the European Union, Statistical and Economic Information, Report 2013.
7. Furmankiewicz, M. (2008): Enhancing endogenous development in rural areas: the implementation of the LEADER pilot programme in Poland, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland.
8. Gallent, N., Juntti, M., Kidd, S., Shaw, D. (2008): Introduction to Rural Planning, Natural and Built Environment Series, Routledge, London/New York.
9. Gorton, M., Hubbard, C., Hubard, L. (2009): The folly of European Union Policy Transfer: Why the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Does not ft Central and Eastern Europe, Regional Studies, vol. 43:10, pp. 1305-1317.
10.Implementation of the Leader approach in Bulgaria. Implementation challenges in Bulgaria in the period 2007-2013 - lessons learned for future programming period, Thematic Group 3, Management Unit of the National Rural Network, 2013.
11. Kjaer, A. M. (2004): Governance, Polity Press, Cambridge.
12.Maurel, C. (2008): Local Development Stakeholders and the European Model. Learning the LEADER Approach in the New Member States, Czech Sociological Review, Vol. 44, no. 3.
13.Program for rural regions development 2007-2013, Ministry of Agriculture and Food, 2007, Sofa, Bulgaria.
14.Local Partnerships for Rural Development, OECD, 1990.
15.Stoyanova, Z. (2011): Local action groups – problems, possibilities, perspectives, pub. ATL-50, Sofa.
16.Terluin, I. (2003): Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: an overview and critical analysis of theories, Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 19(3), pp. 327–344.