SOME FEATURES OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE AGRICULTURAL POLICY WESTERN BALKAN CANDIDATES FOR MARKET ACCESS IN THE EU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1902541SKeywords:
agricultural policy, countries of the Western Balkans, CAP, EU, agriculture, marketAbstract
The agricultural policy of Western Balkan countries in the process of accession to the European Union market is characterized by high volatility, which is expressed in terms of the applied instruments and measures as well as the product concerned. In the first phase of liberalization of prices and trade, most countries abolished or significantly reduced the customs import and export barriers to a wide range of products and also reduced or eliminated production subsidies. Only import tariffs are the only basic protection instrument for producers. Input prices have increased considerably for producers, which has led to a decrease in income in agriculture. In reality, this meant that domestic agricultural production was left to the ruthless competition of EU countries that have far better developed agricultural and food production. In the past few years, the implementation of the new agrarian policy, in countries from the first round of accession candidates, the European Union has introduced budget support measures for producers, mainly in the form of payments per hectare or throat. These budget payments were made according to the model of the EU CAP.
Downloads
References
2. Božić, D., & Papić, R. (2017). Reform of the CAP 2014-2020 and comparison with instruments of agricultural policy in Serbia. Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici, (38), 37-49. https://doi:10.5937/etp1604055B
3. Booth, A. (2018). ASEAN and its changing economic relations with Asia and the World. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 6(1), 33-63.
4. Branović, M. (2016). Agriculture of the Western Balkan countries within the context of EU integrations. Ekonomija: teorija i praksa, 9(4), 35-51.
5. Dower, M. (2014). Empowering rural stakeholders in the Western Balkans. European Commission, Brussels.
6. Dudić, B., Dudić, Z., Smoleň, J., & Mirković, V. (2018), Support for foreign direct investment inflows in Serbia, Economic Annals-XXI 169(1-2), 4-11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V169-01
7. Dudić., B., Drahošová., M., Dudić., Z., Smoleň., J. (2018), The Economic and Trade Relations of Serbia with the European Union, Proceedings of the 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2018: Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020.
8. Gandolfi, G., Regalli, M., Soana, M. G., & Arcuri, M. C. (2018). Underpricing and long-term performance of IPOS: evidence from European intermediary-oriented markets. Economics, Management & Financial Markets, 13(3), 11-36.
9. Gudgin, G., Coutts, K., Gibson, N., & Buchanan, J. (2018). The macro-economic impact of Brexit: using the CBR macro-economic model of the UK economy (UKMOD). Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 6(2), 7-49.
10. Jurišić, Ž. (2014). Croatian agriculture in the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU – today and tomorrow [In Croatian: Jurišić, Ž. (2014). Hrvatska poljoprivreda u zajedničkoj poljoprivrednoj politici Europske unije: sadašnjost i sutrašnjica. Civitas Crisiensis] Zavod za znanstvenoistraživački i umjetnički rad Koprivničkokriževačke županije u Križevcima, 1(1), 207-221.
11. Lovre, K. M., & Trkulja, Đ. (2003). Integrated agricultural and rural development policy of the European Union and implications for the agricultural policy of the countries in transition [In Serbian: Lovre, K. M., & Trkulja, Đ. (2003) Integralna politika agrarnog i ruralnog razvoja Evropske unije i implikacije na agrarnu politiku zemalja u tranziciji.] Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici, (9), 12-14.
12. Lovre, K., & Zekić, S. (2008). The contradictions and complementarity of agrarian and rural development policies. [In Serbian: Lovre, K., & Zekić, S. (2008). Protivrečnosti i komplementarnost agrarne i politike ruralnog razvoja.] Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici, (20), 93.
13. Mikuš, O., Ramani, D., & Franić, R. (2011). Directions of the European Union Common Agrivultural Policy After 2013 [In Croatian: Mikuš, O., Ramani, D., & Franić, R. (2011). Smjernice Zajedničke poljoprivredne politike Europske unije nakon 2013. godine.] Agronomski glasnik: Glasilo Hrvatskog agronomskog društva, 72(6), 345-358.
14. OECD. (2002): Agricultural policies in transition Economies, trends in policies and support, OECD, Paris, 27.
15. Orazulike, U. (2018). Post-Brexit Threats to Work Safety and Health Standards and Good Working Conditions in the UK. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 6(1), 63-95.
16. Prokopijević М. (2009): European Union. [In Serbian: Prokopijević М. (2009) Evropska Unija, Službeni glasnik, Beograd.] 223.
17. Simonović, Z. (2014). Management of agriculture in Serbia in transition. [In Serbian: Upravljanje agrarom Srbije u tranziciji.] Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede, Beograd, 177.
18. Simonovic, Z. (2016). Development policy advisory public service in agriculture in the Republic of Serbia. Ekonomika, 62(1), 59-68. https://doi:10.5937/ekonomika1601059S
19. Stevanović, S., & Đorović, M. (2007). Countries in transition on the path to EU integration in the monograph "International experiences in the transition of the agrarian sector and rural areas". [In Serbian: Stevanović, S., & Đorović, M. (2007). Zemlje u tranziciji na putu integracije u EU-poglavlje u monografiji "Međunarodna iskustva u tranziciji agrarnog sektora i ruralnih područja".] Društvo agrarnih ekonomista Srbije, Poljoprivredni fakultet-Institut za agroekonomiju, Beograd, 9-16.
20. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Serbia for 2018.
21. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Albania for 2017.
22. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Macedonia for 2017.
23. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Montenegro for 2016.
24. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina for 2017.
25. Volk T. (2004): The impact of agrarian policy on the development of agriculture in Slovenia in the period of transition and accession to the European Union. [In Serbian: Volk T. (2004): Uticaj agrarne politike na razvoj poljoprivrede Slovenije u periodu tranzicije i priključenja Evropsku uniju, DAES, Beograd, 2004, 20-21.
26. Volk Т. (2010): Agriculture in the Western Balkan Countries, IAMO, Leibniz, 25-26.
27. Volk, T., Rednak, M., & Erjavec, E. (2012). Western Balkans agriculture and European integration: unused potential and policy failures? Post-Communist Economies, 24(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2012.647631
28. Volk T. At all, (2017). Monitoring the development trends of agricultural policies in the countries of the Western Balkans, the European Union. [In Serbian: Volk T. At all, (2017). Praćenje razvojnih trendova poljoprivrednih politika u zemljama zapadnog Balkana, Kancelarija za publikacije Evropske unije Evropska Unija, Luksemburg.
29. Vujicic, M., Ristic, L., & Vujicic, M. (2012). European integration and rural development policy of the Republic of Serbia and West Balkan countries. Bulgarian journal of agricultural science, 4, 519-530.
30. Union européenne. Commission européenne, & EUROSTAT. (2018). Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics. Publications office of the European Union.
31. APP- Agricultural Policy, Plus South Eastern Europe, Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d6429250-c06f-11e8-9893-01aa75ed71a1 (March 26, 2019).
32. 2018 economic reform programs of Albania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Turkey, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, The Commissions overview and country assessments. ISSN 2443-8014, Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d6429250-c06f-11e8-9893-01aa75ed71a1 (March 25,2019).