HOUSEHOLDS DEMAND FOR GROUND WATER CONSERVATION: THE CASE OF IRRIGATION PRACTICES IN KOMBOLCHA DISTRICT, EASTERN ETHIOPIA

Saleamlak Fentaw; Alem Mazgebo

doi:10.5937/ekoPolj1801173F

Authors

Saleamlak Fentaw, MSc College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, School of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Haramaya University
Alem Mazgebo College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, School of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Haramaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1801173F

Keywords:

Contingent Valuation Method, Groundwater conservation, Tobit model, Willingness to Pay

Abstract

Ground water degradation is the problem, and its management is curial for sustaining the benefit from the resource. To maintain the resource we have to have full information about the value of the resource conservation. Therefore, in this study a contingent valuation survey was conducted in Kombolcha district to elicit households willingness to pay for groundwater conservation. A sample of 394 households was randomly selected, and interviewed. However, after checked for sample selection bias 4 protest bidders were excluded from the data set. Tobit model was applied to determine the factors affecting willingness to pay. The descriptive analysis shows that about 82% of the respondents reported that the groundwater has being degraded due to population pressure, deforestation, soil degradation, agricultural expansion and climatic change. The mean willingness to pay was computed at 60.63 ETB with the total willingness to pay of 1,689,576.21 per annum. The study determined that monthly income, educational level, total farm land holding, total family size, perception and tropical livestock unit were variables that have significant effect on households willingness to pay. Thus, socio-economic variables should also be considered while designing water related projects at household level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Alemu, M. (2000). Valuation of community forestry in Ethiopia: A contingent valuation study of rural households. Environment and Development Economics, Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. 5: 289-308pp.
2. Arrow, K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E. E., Radner R., and Schuman H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Federal Register. 58:4601-4614pp.
3. Central Statistical Agency (CSA), (1995). Report on land utilization, statistical bulletin 132, Central Statistical Authority, Addis Ababa (CSA), Ethiopia.
4. Emerton, L. and Bos, E. (2004). Value: counting ecosystems as an economic part of water infrastructure. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
5. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Population Census Commission (FDREPCC), (2008). Summary and statistical report of the 2007 population and housing census results. December 2008, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), (2003). Groundwater management. The search for practical approaches. Water Reports 25. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
7. Haab, T.C. and McConnell, K.E. (2002). Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non market valuation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham U.K.
8. Johnston J, and Dindaro, J. (1997). Econometric methods. 4th edition. New York.
9. Long, S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variable.
10. Maddala, GS. (1997). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, 1-631 pp.
11. Maddala, G.S. (1992). Introduction to econometrics. 2ndedition. Macmillan, Inc, University of Florida and Ohio state university, NewYork.
12. Malanson, G.P. (1993). Riparian landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. McDonald, JF. and Mafftt, A. (1980). The use of Tobit analysis. Rev. Econ. Stat., 62(2): 318-312pp.
14. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, 463 p.
15. Morris, B L., Lawrence, ARL., Chilton, P J C., Adams, B., Calow R C. and Klinck, B.A. (2003). Groundwater and its susceptibility to degradation: a global assessment of the problem and options for management. Early Warning and Assessment Report Series, RS. 03-3. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.
16. Siebert, S., Burke, J., Faures, J. M., Frenken, K., Hoogeveen, J., D¨oll, P., and Portmann, F.T. (2010). Groundwater use for irrigation - a global inventory. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, 1863–1880pp.