THE ANALYSIS OF THE AARHUS CONVENTION IN THE CONTEXT OF GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine mechanisms for public involvement in environmental governance from the perspective of the Aarhus Convention. Analysis method explained the connection between the basic postulates included in the Aarhus Convention and the main principles of good governance in environmental matters. Normative methods presented the provisions of the Aarhus Convention related to the right to an adequate environment and rights of access to information, public participation, and equal access to justice. By using the same method, the special attention was devoted to the transposition and implementation of the requirements of the Convention into the legal system of the Republic of Serbia. Through the case study research method, the authors examined the relevant practice of the Compliance Committee. Authors conclude that transposition of the requirements of the Aarhus Convention represents a valuable contribution in establishing good environmental governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Andrusevych, A., Alge, T., & Konrad, C., (2011). Case Law of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (2004-2011), Retrieved from https://www.eufje.org/images/DocAarhus/Aarhus%20CC%20case-law.pdf ( July 25, 2018).

2. Andrusevych, A., & Kern S., (2016). Case Law of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (2004-2014), Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fleadmin/DAM/env/pp/compliance/CC_Publication/ACCC_Case_Law_3rd_edition_eng.pdf ( July 25, 2018).

3. Application against United Kingdom, ACCC/C/2008/27, ECE/MP.PP/C.1/2010/6/Add. 2, 24 September 2010.

4. Bastmeijer, K., & ‎Koivurova, T., (2008). Theory and Practice of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston.

5. Drenovak Ivanovic, M., (2011). Implementation of the Aarhus Convention in Serbia, European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 2(2), 58-71.

6. Etinski, R., (2013). Specific features of human rights guaranteed by the Aarhus Convention, Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad, 47( 2), 79-92.

7. Individual Report on the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision–Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, (2013). Office Of The United Nations High Commissioner For Human Rights, Special Procedures of the United Nations Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. А/65/38(SUPP).

8. Law on Environmental Impact Assessment, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, no. 135/04, 36/09 and 88/10. [in Serbian: Zakon o o proceni uticaja na životnu sredinu, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije“, br. 135/04, 36/2009 i 88/2010].

9. Law on Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, no. 135 / 04-14 / 16. [in Serbian: Zakon o zaštiti životne sredine Republike Srbije, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije “, br. 135/04-14/16].

10. Law on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, no. 135/04. [in Serbian: Zakon o o integrisanom sprečavanju i kontroli zagađivanja životne sredine, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije“, br. 135/04].

11. Mason, M., (2010). Information Disclosure and Environmental Rights: The Aarhus Convention”, Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 10-31.

12. Mladenov, M., (2017). The right to an adequate environment as a basic human right, doctoral dissertation, the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad, Novi Sad. [in Serbian: Pravo na odgovarajuću životnu sredinu kao osnovno ljudsko pravo, doktorska disertacija, Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu, Novi Sad].

13. Morgera, E., (2005). An Update on the Aarhus Convention and its Continued Global Relevance, The Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 14(2), 138-147.

14. Nature Conservation Law, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, no. 36/09 and 88/10. [in Serbian: Zakon o zaštiti prirode, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije“, br. 36/2009 i 88/2010].

15. Pallemaerts, M., (2011). The Aarhus Convention at Ten Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, Amsterdam.

16. Stec S., (2003). Handbook on Access to Justice under the Aarhus Convention, The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe, Hungary.

17. Strategy for Implementing the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters – The Aarhus Convention, (2011). The Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning, Belgrade, Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/serbia/89086?download=true (June 15, 2018).

18. Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, no. 98/06. [in Serbian: Ustav Republike Srbije, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije“, br. 98/06].

19. Treves, T., ‎Fodella A, ‎&Tanzi A. (2005). Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies, Cambridge University Press, US.

20. Zengerling, C., (2013). Greening International Jurisprudence: Environmental NGOs before International Courts, Tribunals, and Compliance Committees, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, Netherlands.
Published
2018-12-28
How to Cite
POČUČA, Milan Bogdan; MLADENOV, Marijana; MIRKOVIĆ, Predrag. THE ANALYSIS OF THE AARHUS CONVENTION IN THE CONTEXT OF GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 65, n. 4, p. 1615-1625, dec. 2018. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <http://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/965>. Date accessed: 28 sep. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1804615P.