Similarities and differences between lowland and mountain regions in the Republic of Srpska

Authors

  • Stevo Mirjani?, PhD University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture, Banja Luka
  • Željko Vaško, PhD University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture, Banja Luka
  • Aleksandar Ostoji?, PhD University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture, Banja Luka
  • Gordana Rokvi?, MSc. University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture, Banja Luka
  • Vesna Mrdalj, MSc. University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture, Banja Luka
  • Ljiljana Drini?, MSc. University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture, Banja Luka
  • Aleksandra Figurek, MSc. University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture, Banja Luka

Keywords:

mountain region, lowland region, unequal development.

Abstract

Having taken the pre-war zoning in BiH as a starting point, in the Strategic Rural Development Plan of the Republic of Srpska its municipalities have been reclassified into the same regions. Based on the survey conducted in 802 rural households from 9 mountain and 3 lowland municipalities, analysis and comparison of the collected data between mountain and lowland regions have been done. The research has confrmed unequal development between rural households in mountain and lowland regions in reference to most of the considered characteristics. In comparison to lowland households, the ones in mountain regions dispose with more meadows and pastures, but fewer ploughed felds, have less capital equipment, generate lower income with non-agricultural activities making a major part. Moreover they are oriented towards livestock breeding, mountain villages have fewer communal infrastructure facilities and less access to health, education and other services. Due to all of these, additional effort should be invested in the future to reduce those differences by introducing special and differentiating already existing measures in order to direct them at faster and intensifed development of mountain region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Dugoročni program razvoja agrarne privrede u Bosni i Hercegovini od 1986. do 2000. godine (1986), Republički komitet za poljoprivredu, šumarstvo i vodoprivredu, Sarajevo, pg. 115-116.
2. Human Health Impacts from Climate Variability and Climate Change in the Hindu Kush-Himalaya Region (2005), Report of Inter-Regional workshop, Mukteshwar, India, World Health Organization, Regional Offce for South-East Asia, pg. 3,
3. Mirjanić Stevo, Vaško Željko, Ostojić Aleksandar, Rokvić Gordana, Mrdalj Vesna, Drinić Ljiljana, Vučenović Aleksandra, Ruralni razvoj Republike Srpske (2010), Univerzitet u Banjaluci, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Banja Luka, pg. 223-224.
4. Prostorni plan RS do 2015. godine (2008), Urbanistički zavod RS, Banja Luka, pg. 38. i 63-64,
5. Rokvić Gordana, Vaško Željko, Aleksandra Vučenović, Regionalization – A Rural Development Policy (2009), Memoire of international scientifc symposium, Banats University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Timisoara, pg. 173-178,
6. Strateški plan ruralnog razvoja Republike Srpske za period 2009-2015 (2009), Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede RS, Banja Luka,
7. Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development (SARD), policy brief 19 (2007), pg. 1.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-03

How to Cite

Mirjanić, S., Vaško, Željko, Ostojić, A., Rokvić, G., Mrdalj, V., Drinić, L., & Figurek, A. (2010). Similarities and differences between lowland and mountain regions in the Republic of Srpska. Economics of Agriculture, 57(Spec.num.2), 131–138. Retrieved from https://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/924