MODELS OF PARTNERSHIPS AND ORGANISATIONAL FORMS IN SHORT FOOD SUPPLY CHAINS IN THE SLOVENIAN MOUNTAINS

Authors

  • Andreja Borec, PhD University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hoče
  • Jernej Prišenk, M.Sc. University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hoče

Keywords:

mountain food product, short food supply chain, actors partnership

Abstract

An important condition for the efficient production and marketing of local food products in mountainous regions is broadly recognised in cooperation between different partners along the food supply chain. Cooperation between different actors, organisational forms and sectors is especially important in mountains and less favoured areas characterised by limited conditions for agriculture and, consequently, where few raw materials are produced. This article presents a study aimed at identifying the positive effects of cooperation between actors, organisational forms and sectors in the production and marketing system of local food products in the Slovenian mountains. Ten products were included in the study. The results indicate that the presence of the private sector both in the production and marketing system is an important condition for creating a successful and solid food supply chain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Alphonce, C. B. (1997): Application of the analytic hierarchy process in agriculture in developing countries, Agricultural Systems 53(1), pg. 97-112.
2. Bohanec, M., Rajkovič, V. (1990): DEX: An expert system shell for decision support, Sistemica 1(1), pg. 145-157.
3. EuroMARC (2010): Mountain Agrofood products in Europe, their consumers, retailers and local initiatives. Smernice za razvoj, promocijo in komuniciranje o gorsko-hribovskih prehranskih izdelkih: Guidelines for stakeholders of the mountain food supply chains and related sectors. Brussels. www.euromontana.org/images/stories/projets/EuroMARC/docs_NL_et_actes/guidelines_euromarc_report_sl.pdf (accessed 12 December 2011).
4. Galli, F., Carbone, A., Caswell, J. A., Sorrentino, A. (2011): A multi-criteria approach to assessing PDOs/PGIs: An Italian pilot study, International Journal of Food System Dynamics 2(3), pg. 219-236.
5. Hyde, K. M., Maier, H. R. (2006): Distance-based and stochastic uncertainty analysis for multi-criteria decision analysis in Excel using Visual Basic for Applications, Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 21, pg. 1695-1710.
6. Marsden, T., Banks, J., Bristow, G. (2000): Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development, Sociologia Ruralis 40(4), pg. 424-438.
7. Pažek, K., Rozman, Č., Bavec, F., Borec, A., Bavec, M. (2010): A multi-criteria decision analysis framework tool for the selection of farm business models on organic mountain farms, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 34(7), pg. 778-799.
8. Perpar, A. (2002): Razvojne značilnosti slovenskega podeželja – Developmental characteristics of the Slovenian countryside, Master thesis, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, pg. 410.
9. Rozman, Č., Potočnik, M., Pažek, K., Borec, A., Bohanec, M. (2009): A multi-criteria assessment of tourist farm service quality, Tourism Management 30, pg. 629-637.
10.Saaty, T. L. (1980): The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill. 11. Tiwari, D. N., Loof, R., Paudyal, G. N. (1999): Environmental-economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques, Agricultural Systems 60, pg. 99-112.
12.Tojnko, S., Rozman, Č., Unuk, T. (2011): A qualitative multi-attribute model for the multifunctional assessment of "Streuobst Stands" in NE Slovenia, Erwerbs-Obstbau 53(4), pg. 157-166.
13.United States Department of Agriculture (2010): Local food systems – Concepts, impacts and issues, Economic Research Report Number 97, Economic Research Service, May 2010, pg. 87.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-30

How to Cite

Borec, A., & Prišenk, J. (2013). MODELS OF PARTNERSHIPS AND ORGANISATIONAL FORMS IN SHORT FOOD SUPPLY CHAINS IN THE SLOVENIAN MOUNTAINS. Economics of Agriculture, 60(2), 277–286. Retrieved from https://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/461