STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL OF SUBCONTRACT PALINKA DISTILLATION

Authors

  • Imre Milan Harcsa, Ph.D. student Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1704379H

Keywords:

palinka, investment economic benefts, net present value, single-step distillation, scenario analysis.

Abstract

Hungary has a centuries-long palinka distilling tradition. Palinka is prepared by the traditional method of "Kisusti" or the more economical single-step technology. Methods for the improvement of the quality and cost-effciency of palinka preparation will include investments into an up-to-date technology, the focal point of my investigation in the present paper in terms of economic indicators (net present value), internal rate of return, proftability index and discount rate time. The calculations assessed several (optimistic, realistic and pessimistic) scenarios. Legislative changes have exerted a considerable impact on the turnover of palinka distilleries, and the re-introduction of the excise tax for subcontract distilling has resulted in frequent changes since 2010 and indicated an unpromising tendency. A further problem concerns dependence on agricultural source material production (fruit production) and the existence of home distilling. In conclusion, benefcial economic conditions will be the key elements in the implementation of the investment mentioned above.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anthony, R. N. – Dearden, J. – Govindarajan, V. (1992): Management Control Systems. Seventh Edition, IRWIN, Boston, MA 02116, 290–292, 388–389. p.
2. Bánvölgyi Sz. – Galambos I. – Márki E. – Vatai Gy. (2013): A palinkakészítés műveletei és berendezései. Egyetemi jegyzet, BCE, Budapest, p. 107-114.
3. Bóta G. (2006): Vállalati gazdasági elemzések reálopciókkal. Ph.D. dissertation, Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem, Budapest, p. 6-20.
4. Brealey, R. A. – Myers, S. C. – Allen, F. (2006): Corporate Finance. Eight Edition, McGraw-Hill, 84–143. p., 244–272. p.
5. Budnick, F. S. (1988): Applied Mathematics for Business, Economics, and the Social Sciences. Third Edition, McGraw-Hill International Edition, 894–897. p.
6. Harcsa I. M. – Nábrádi A. – Tar I. (2014): Hungarian spirits Palinka as a hungaricum I. In: APSTRACT Vol. 8. Number 2–3. 2014, p. 133-141. DOI: 10.19041/APSTRACT/2014/2-3/16
7. Helfert, E. R. (2001): Financial Analysis: Tools and Techniques, A Guide for Managers, McGraw-Hill, 221–296. p.
8. Kay, R. D. – Edwards, W. M. (1994): Farm Management. Third Edition, McGrawHill, 281–299. p.
9. Lee, W. F. – Boehlje, M. D. – Nelson, A. G. – Murray, W. G. (1980): Agricultural Finance. Seventh Edition, the Iowa State University Press, Ames, 59–80. P
10.Nábrádi A. – Felföldi J. (2007): A mezőgazdsaági vállalkozások eredményének mérése. In: [ed(s): Nábrádi A. , Pupos T. , Takácsné György K.], Üzemtan I., Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetem, Agrár- és Műszaki Tudományok Centruma. p. 85-97.
11.Nábrádi A. – Szőllősi L. (2007): Key aspects of investment analysis. In APSTRACT 2007/1 Agroinform Kiadó, Budapest, p. 53-56. DOI: 10.19041/Apstract/2007/1/7
12.Szűcs I. – Nagy L. (2004): Gyakorlati alkalmazások – Az üzleti tervezés gyakorlata. Campus Kiadó, Debrecen, p. 55-59.
13.Tétényi V. (2001): Pénzügyi és vállalkozásfnanszírozási ismeretek. Perfekt Kiadó, p. 17-23.
14.Warren, M. F. (1982): Financial Management for Farmers, the Basic Techniques of Money Farming. Third Edition, Stanly Thornes Ltd, 240–246., 259–260. p.
15.http://193.6.12.228/uigtk/uipz/hallgatoi/befdont.pdf (access: 2017.06.01)

Downloads

Published

2017-12-20

How to Cite

Harcsa, I. M. (2017). STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL OF SUBCONTRACT PALINKA DISTILLATION. Economics of Agriculture, 64(4), 1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1704379H

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers