CONCENTRATIONS OF ECONOMIC ENTITIES IN THE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THEIR CONNECTION WITH THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2004233K

Keywords:

competition, concentrations, companies, agriculture, market

Abstract

Purpose The paper should confirm that concentrations of economic entities, which perform agricultural or other activities, in addition to distorting competition, are frequent cases of competition protection on the European Union market.

Methodology The paper uses dogmatic and normative method that highlights existing legal solutions and indicate the directions of de lege ferenda solutions and method of content analysis.

Results Concentrations of business entities are playing an increasing role in the world economy and law. The process of globalization of international trade and increasing competition among businessmen, especially in the countries of the European Union, have contributed to this.

Conclusions Concentrations of business entities are important in creating market monopolies and they represent means of protecting the global market.

Recommendations An important aspect of the concentration is its compatibility with the global market, otherwise, the application of temporary measures is recommended in order to restore the previous state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Andrei, J. V., Popescu, G. H., Nica, E., & Chivu, L. (2020). The impact of agricultural performance on foreign trade concentration and competitiveness: empirical evidence from Romanian agriculture. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(2), 317-343. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.11988
2. Begović, B. (2002). Antimonopolska politika u SR Jugoslavij: Analiza postojećih tržišnih struktura i antimonopolskih institucija, Centar za liberalno demokratske studije, Beograd, Srbija. [in English: Begovic, B. (2002). Antitrust Policy in FR Yugoslavia: Analysis of Existing Market Structures and Antitrust Institutions, Center for Liberal Democratic Studies, Belgrade, Serbia.].
3. Begović, B. (2014). Strukturne veze: širenje domena kontrole koncetracija i posledica po pravnu sigurnost, Pravna sigurnost u uslovima tranzicije, Beograd. [in English: Begović, B. (2014). Structural links: expanding the domain of control of concentrations and consequences for legal security, Legal security in the conditions of transition, Belgrade.].
4. Cheminade, Y. (1970). Nature juridique de la fusion des personnes et des societies anonyimes, 23, Revue trimestrielle de droit commercial. [in English: Cheminade, Y. (1970). Legal nature of the merger of persons and anonymous companies, 23, Quarterly review of commercial law].
5. Chivu, L. (2019). Local entrepreneurship and social services in Romania. Territorial analysis. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.04.001
6. Ciutacu, C., & Chivu, L. (2014). About Agrarian structures and economic advantages. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 182-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00079-3
7. Gavrić Stepanović, S. (2000).Fuzija preduzeće u natimonopolskom pravu Evropske unije, 1-2, Pravo i privreda. [in English: Gavrić Stepanović, S. (2000). Fusion company in the antitrust law of the European Union, 1-2, Law and Economy.].
8. Jevremović Petrović, T. (2010). Prekogranična spajanja društava u pravu EU, Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd, Srbija. [in English: Jevremović Petrović, T. (2010). Cross-border mergers of companies in EU law, Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.].
9. Mićović, M. (2010). Privredno pravo, Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Kragujevac, Srbija. [in English: Mićović, M. (2010). Commercial Law, Faculty of Law, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.].
10. Odeny, J. A., Maingi, S., & Kurauka, J. (2020). The role of procurement procedures in environmental management: A case study of classifed hotels in Mombasa County, Kenya. Hotel and Tourism Management, 8(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.5937/menhottur2001011A
11. Pantić, N., Milojević, I., & Mićović, A. (2020). Menadžerska analiza mogućnosti upravljanja procesom privatizacije. Tehnika, 75(4), 493-497. [in English: Pantić, N., Milojević, I., & Mićović, A. (2020). Managerial analysis of the possibilities of managing the privatization process. Technique, 75 (4), 493-497.] https://doi.org/10.5937/tehnika2004493P
12. Rakić, I. (2014). Primena propisa o kontroli koncetracija na strukturne veze – osvrt na predlog Evropske komisije, 4-6, Pravo i privreda. [in English: Rakić, I. (2014). Application of regulations on control of concentrations on structural links - a review of the proposal of the European Commission, 4-6, Law and Economy.].
13. Spasić, I. (2007). Komunitarno pravo konkurencije. Strani pravni život: Teorija, zakonodavstvo, praksa, 1-2, 62-83. [in English: Spasić, I. (2007). Community competition law. Foreign Legal Life: Theory, Legislation, Practice, 1-2, 62-83.].
14. Spasić, V. (2017). Pravo intelektualne svojine, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu, Centar za publikacije. [in English: Spasić, V. (2017). Intellectual Property Law, Faculty of Law, University of Nis, Publications Center.].
15. Stanivuković, M. (2009). Primena domaćih pravila o zaštiti konkurencije na pravne odnose sa međunarodnim elementom po uzoru na pravo Evropske zajednice. Anali pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2, 110-1. [in English: Stanivuković, M. (2009). Application of domestic rules on protection of competition to legal relations with an international element modeled on European Community law. Annals of the Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade, 2, 110-1.].
16. Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2010/C 83/01.
17. Vasiljević, M. (2004). Poslovno pravo, Udruženje pravnika u privredi SCG, Beograd, Srbija. [in English: Vasiljević, M. (2004). Business law, Association of Lawyers in the Economy of Serbia and Montenegro, Belgrade, Serbia.].
18. Case Steetly/Tarmac IV/M.180, 1992 4 CMLR 337. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m180_9_en.pdf
19. Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32004R0139
20. Case Newspaper Publishing IV/M.423, Regulation (EEC) no 4064/89 Merger procedure. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m423_en.pdf
21. Case No IV/M.567 - Lyonnaise Des Eaux /Northumbrian Water, Regulation (EEC) no 4064/89, Merger Procedure https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m567_en.pdf
22. Case British Aerospace/GEC Marconi, 1999, Offcial Journal of the European Union C241/8.https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31999M1438
23. Case IV/M.784, (1997) OJ L174/47, Case T-22/97, Kesko Oy v. Commission (1999) ECR II-3755, (2000) 4 CMLR 335.
24. Commission Notice on a simplifed procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004, Offcial Journal of the European Union 2005/С 56/04. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013XC1214%2802%29&from=EN
25. Commission Consolidated Jurisdictional Notice under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, Official Journal of the European Union C 95/1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52008XC0416%2808%29
26. Commission Notice on Case Allocation Under the Referral Rules of the Merger Regulation (2005) OJ C56/2. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52005XC0305(01)&from=EN
27. Commission Decision of 8 June 1994 declaring the compatibility of a concentration with the common market (Case No IV/M. 269 - Shell/Montecatini), Official Journal of the European Union 94/811/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/BG/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31994D0811
28. Commission Decision of 22 July 1992 relating to a proceeding under Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Case No IV/M.190 - Nestlé/Perrier), Official Journal of the European Union, 92/553/EEC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31992D0553
29. Commission Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case No IV/M.877 - Boeing/McDonnell Douglas), 97/816/EC https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31997D0816
30. Commission Decision relating to a proceeding pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Case No IV/M.308 - Kali- Salz/MdK/Treuhand) (Text with EEA relevance), 94/449/EC https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31994D0449
31. Case COMP/M. 3304-GE/Amersham (2004), https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m3304_en.pdf
32. Commission Notice on remedies acceptable under Council Regulation (EC) no. 139/2004 and under Commission Regulation (EC) no. 802/2004 (2008/C 267/01) https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:267:0001:0027:EN:PDF
33. EC Treaty 2002, Offcial Journal of the European Communitie C40E/181 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:1FqmLgPM6kcJ:eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do%3Furi%3DOJ:C:2002:040E:0181:0182:EN:PDF+&cd=1&hl=hr&ct=clnk&gl=ba
34. Guidelines on the Method of Setting Fines Imposed Pursuant to Article 23(2)(A) of Regulation No. 1/2003, 2006, Offcial Journal of the European Union OJ C210/2 https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:210:0002:0005:en:PDF
35. Guidelines on the assessment of non-horizontal mergers under the Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings, Official Journal of the European Union 2008/C 265/07. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52008XC1018(03)&rid=6
36. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 2004, Offcial Journal of the European Union C31/5. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52004XC0205(02)&from=EN
37. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 2004, Offcial Journal of the European Union C31/5. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52004XC0205(02)&from=EN
38. Regulation of contraction control between entrepreneurs, No. 139/2004, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32004R0139
39. Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2010/C 83/01 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:6985a220-b291-422c-8e7ce2625a041d0d.0006.01/DOC_1&format=PDF

Downloads

Published

2020-12-26

How to Cite

Krstić, B. (2020). CONCENTRATIONS OF ECONOMIC ENTITIES IN THE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THEIR CONNECTION WITH THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR. Economics of Agriculture, 67(4), 1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2004233K

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)