CAUSES OF DIFFERENT PROFITABILITY OF AGRICULTURAL SECTOR

  • Branko Vučković, M.A. Vojvodjanska Banka NBG Group

Abstract

This work involves identifcation of causes of different proftability of agricultural sector done on case study of nearly identical agricultural enterprises. It shows that fnancial mix even in scope of similar companies can lead to various proft indicators. Through comparative fnancial analysis in the same industry and activity by applying methods and techniques we have concluded that company PP Ratkovo operates more stable and closer to determined norms and also shows better results in majority of the indicators. Horizontal and vertical analysis indicates that companies in Agribusiness partner group use expensive external sources of fnancing. We have precisely defned in which cost segment occurs highest distinction. Also we have shown reasons why PP Ratkovo in the last two years manifests great proftability measured by ebit, ebitda and net proft as well as excellent structure of material costs and wages costs in in frame of the operating income, and reasons why enterprises in Agribusiness partner group does not.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Agencija za privredne registre (2014, December 24), available on: http://www.apr.gov.rs.
2. Amarender, R. (2013): Farm proftability and Labor Use Effciency, Indian Journal of Dry land Agricultural Research Development, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 1-21.
3. Babović, J., Veselinović, B. (2010): Agrarna politika EU i prilagođavanje agrara Srbije, Zbornik radova, Društveni izazovi evropskih integracija – Srbija i uporedna iskustva, Fakultet za pravne i poslovne studije, Novi Sad, Srbija, ISBN 978-86-515-0556-3, pp. 195-206.
4. Chukwunweike, E. (2014): The Impact of Liquidity on Proftability of Some Selected Companies: The Financial Statement Analysis (FSA) Approach, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 81-90.
5. Detre, D., Mishra, A. (2012): Drivers of agricultural proftability in the USA: An application of the Du Pont expansion method, Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 72 No. 3, pp. 325-340.
6. D’Antoni, J., Mishra, A., Chintawar, S. (2009). Predicting Financial Stress in Young and Beginning Farmers in the United States, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/46861/2/Predicting%20Financial%20Stress%20in%20Young%20and%20Beginning%20Farmers.pdf.
7. Investiciono-razvojni fond Crne Gore (2014, December 24), available on: http://www.irfcg.me.
8. Katchova, A. (2010): An Analysis of the Financial Performance of Beginning Farmers, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/61513/2/katchova.pdf.
9. Malešević, Đ. (2013): The relevance of ratio analysis for the purposes of decision making on liquidity and proftability, Računovodstvo, Vol. 57 No. 5-6, pp. 38-50.
10. Maniriho, A., Bizoza, A. (2013): Financial Beneft-Cost Analysis of Agricultural Production in Musanze District (Rwanda), Academia Arena, Vol. 5, No. 12, pp. 30-39.
11. Mishra, A., Wilson, C., Williams, R. (2009): Factors affecting fnancial performance of new and beginning farmers, Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 69 No. 2, pp. 160-179.
12. Narodna banka Srbije (2014, December 24), available on: http://www.nbs.rs/internet/cirilica/67/pn.html.
13. O’Donnell, C. (2010): Measuring and decomposing agricultural productivity and proftability change, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 527-560.
14. Paraušić, V., Cvijanović, J., Mihailović, B. (2013): Market analysis of clusters in Serbian agribusiness, Ekonomika poljoprivrede, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 713-728.
15. Račić, Ž., Barjaktarović, L., Zeremski, A. (2011). Analysis of indebtedness impact on the proftability of successful domestic companies in the fnancial crisis, Industrija, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 45-60.
16. Ranković, J. (2004): Upravljanje fnansijama preduzeća, Proinkom, Beograd.
17. Sharif, O. (2013): Financial Management and Ratio Analysis for Agricultural Cooperatives, Global Journal of Commerce & Management Perspective, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 127-133.
18. Slavickiene, A., Savickiene, J. (2014): Comparative Analysis of Farm Economic Viability Assessment Methodologies, European Scientifc Journal, Vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 130-150.
19. Veselinović, B., Drobnjaković, M. (2014): Qualitative and quantitative analysis of micro and macro aspects of agricultural fnance, Economics of Agriculture, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 771-786.
20. Veselinović, B., Vunjak, N. (2014): Poslovne fnansije - teorija i praksa, Drugo izdanje, Fakultet za ekonomiju i inženjerski menadžment, Novi Sad, Srbija.
Published
2016-01-31
How to Cite
VUČKOVIĆ, Branko. CAUSES OF DIFFERENT PROFITABILITY OF AGRICULTURAL SECTOR. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 63, n. 1, p. 123-141, jan. 2016. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <http://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/181>. Date accessed: 24 oct. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1601123V.