IDENTIFICATION OF THE AREA GROUPS OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS BENEFITING FROM THE REDISTRIBUTIVE PAYMENT SCHEME - A POLISH CASE STUDY
The aim of this paper was to answer the question of which area groups of Polish agricultural holdings had incurred loss on (and which had benefited from) applying the redistributive payment. Mathematical methods were applied. It was found that in the period between 2015 and 2019, holdings with a size of up to 6 ha and holdings with a size of over 55 ha incurred loss on the introduction of redistributive payment in its current form (some slight differences were identified as regards the threshold holding areas in individual years of the period in question). Thus, holdings with areas between 6 and 55 ha benefited from redistributive payment. The redistributive effects of the instrument are too weak in Poland to consider it a tool for accelerating positive structural transformations in agriculture.
2. Beluhova-Uzunova, R., Atanasov, D., & Shishkova, M. (2019). Direct Payments in Bulgaria – Trends and Perspectives. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Management, 64(3), 42-50.
3. Buckwell, A., Matthew, A., Baldock, D., & Mathijs, E. (2017). CAP: Thinking Out of the Box. Further modernisation of the CAP – why, what and how? Rural Investment Support for Europe (RISE) Foundation, Brussels, Belgium.
4. Chatellier, V. (2018). Le paiement redistributif et le plafonnement des aides directes: deux outils de la PAC favorables aux petites exploitations agricoles françaises? Colloque de la SFER „Politiques agricoles et alimentaires: trajectoires et réformes”, Montpellier, 20 et 21 juin 2018.
5. Ciliberti, S., & Frascarelli, A. (2018). The CAP 2013 reform of direct payments: redistributive effects and impacts on farm income concentration in Italy. Agricultural and Food Economics, 6, 1-18.
6. European Commission - Redistributive payment, Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/food-farming-fisheries/key_policies/documents/ds-dpredistributive-payment_en.pdf (April 15, 2020).
7. Forstner, B., Duden, Ch., Ellßel, R., Gocht, A., Hansen, H., Neuenfeldt, S., Offermann, F., & de Witte, T. (2018). Wirkungen von Direktzahlungen in der Landwirtschaft – ausgewählte Aspekte mit Bezug zum Strukturwandel. Thünen Working Paper, 96.
8. Hansen, H., & Offermann, F. (2016). Direktzahlungen in Deutschland – Einkommens- und Verteilungswirkungen der EU-Agrarreform 2013. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2(65), 77-93. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.284972
9. Implications of the new redistributive payment, Retrieved from http://capreform.eu/implications-of-the-new-redistributive-payment/ (June 2, 2020).
10. Ivanov, B., Malamova, N., & Sokolova, E. (2015). The new direct payments paradigm in the CAP 2014-2020: economic effects of “green” and redistributive payments on Bulgarian agriculture. Paper prepared for presentation at the 147th EAAE Seminar ‘CAP Impact on Economic Growth and Sustainability of Agriculture and Rural Areas’, Sofa, Bulgaria, October 7-8.
11. Kulawik, J. (2015). Global and European determinants of the CAP. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 345(4), 38-57.
12. Majewski, E., & Malak-Rawlikowska, A. (2018). Scenarios of the Common Agricultural Policy after 2020. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 1(354), 9-37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30858/zer/89613
13. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (2015). Design of direct payment system in 2015-2020, Warsaw, Poland. [in Polish: Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi (2015). Projekt systemu płatności bezpośrednich w latach 2015- 2020, Warszawa, Polska].
14. Potori, N., Kovács, M., & Vásáry, V. (2013). The Common Agricultural Policy 2014-2020: an impact assessment of the new system of direct payments in Hungary. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 115(3), 118-123. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1318
15. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (COM(2018) 392).
16. Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 608, as amended).
17. Sadłowski, A. (2018). Optional payments of the first pillar under CAP vs the average amount of support per farm. Economic and Regional Studies 11(30), 148- 161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ers-2018-0031
18. Sadłowski, A. (2019). The Planned Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and its Effect on the Direct Support Scheme in Poland. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 360(3), 107-126. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30858/zer/112133
19. Sadłowski, A. (2020). The planned reform of the Common Agricultural Policy with particular reference to the direct support system. Agricultural Economics, 66(8), 381-390. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/397/2019-AGRICECON
20. Šlajs, J., & Doucha, T. (2014). Situation in the Czech agriculture after 9 years of EU accession – a research position to strategic challenges for a future policy after 2013. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 1(338), 116-127.