ANALYSIS OF CANOLA (RAPESEED) PRODUCTION COST AND INCOME IN CONTEXT OF OILSEEDS PRODUCTION SUPPORT POLICIES: A CASE STUDY FROM TRAKYA REGION OF TURKEY

Abstract

The study aimed to analysis the cost and income of canola production in the context of support policies to oilseeds production in the Trakya region of Turkey. In this study, the average production costs of canola were calculated as 600.13 US$ ha-1. Gross profit and net profit excluding support payments were found as 515.98 and 310.32 US$ ha-1, respectively. It was determined that the gross profit and net profit including support payments were found to be 921.37 and 715.72 US$ ha-1. It was calculated that the share of supports is 44% in gross and 56.64% in net profits. The results indicated that the supports of diesel oil, fertilizer, certified seed usage and premium support have important increasing effects on farmer income and decreasing costs in canola production. As a result, it can be said that with the support policies applied in canola production, important increases have occurred in canola cultivation areas and production in Turkey. In order to have an efficient oilseed support policy, farmer’s extension service should develop various programs regarding sustainable canola production practices to educate farmers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.AERI, (2001). Input Use and Production Costs for Important Crops in Some Regions of Turkey. [Türkiye’de Bazı Bölgeler İçin Önemli Ürünlerde Girdi Kullanımı ve Üretim Maliyetleri]. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Research report, Publication No. 64, 248, Ankara-Turkey.
2. MP, (2005). Master Plan (MP), Provincial Agriculture and Rural Development Master Plan. Retrieved from https://www.tarim.gov.tr/SGB/Belgeler/Master/edirne.pdf. (May 15, 2017).
3. Benni, N., Finger, R., & Mann, S. (2012). Effects of agricultural policy reforms and farm characteristics on income risk in Swiss agriculture. Agricultural Finance Review, 72 (3), 301-324.
4. Celik Ates, H., Yilmaz, H., Demircan, V., Gul, M., Ozturk, E., & Ormeci Kart, M.C. (2017). How did post-2000 agricultural policy changes in Turkey affect farmers? – A focus group evaluation. Land Use Policy, 69, 298–306.
5. Chau, N.H., & Gorter. H. (2005). Disentangling the Consequences of Direct Payment Schemes in Agriculture on Fixed Costs, Exit Decisions, and Output. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 1174–1181.
6. Devadoss, S., Gibson, M.J., & Luckstead, J. (2016). The Impact of Agricultural Subsidies on the Corn Market with Farm Heterogeneity and Endogenous Entry and Exit. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 41(3), 499–517
7. Dorward, A. & Morrison, J. (2015). Heroes, villains and victims: agricultural subsidies and their impacts on food security and poverty reduction. Available at: https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/16754/1/Subsidies%20chapter%20%20Dorward%20Morrison%20posted.pdf. (May 12, 2018).
8. Drabenstott, M. (2015). Do farm payments promote rural economic growth?. Ag Decision Maker, 9 (6). http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/agdm/vol9/iss6/2. (April 18, 2018).
9. Erkus, A., Bülbül, M., Kıral, T., Açıl A. F., & Demirci, R. (1995). Agricultural Economics [Tarım Ekonomisi]. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Pres, Ankara, Turkey
10. FAOSTAT (2018). Crop statistics, the statistics division of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Retrieved from http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E. (September 20, 2017).
11. Karasar., N. (1991). Scientific research method [Bilimsel Araştırma metodu]. 4th ed. Ankara, Turkey
12. Kiral, T., Kasnakoglu H., Tatlidil, F., Fidan, H & Gundogmus, E. (1999). Data Base Guide and Production Cost Methodology for Agricultural Products. [Tarımsal Ürünler için Maliyet Hesaplama Metodolojisi ve Veritabanı Rehberi]. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Publication no: 37, Ankara-Turkey.
13. Lajqi, S., Thaqi, M., Kaçiu, K., Bytyqi, H., & Krasniqi, B.A. (2017). Impact of Agrıcultural Interventıon Programs on Income and Employment: Evıdence from Vegetable Sector in Kosovo. Economic Thought and Practice (Ekonomska misao i praksa), (2): 561-592.
14. Monjezi, N., & Zakidizaji., H. (2012). Energy and Economic Analysis of Canola Production in Iran a Case Study: Khuzestan Province. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4 (3), 227-231.
15. Munćan, P., & Božić, D. (2013). The Effects of Input Subsıdıes on Fıeld Crop Productıon in Serbıa. Economics of Agriculture, 60 (3), 585-594.
16. Ören, M.N., & Bahadir, B. (2005). Livestock Policies and Policy Transfers in Turkey and OECD Countries, [Türkiye’de ve OECD Ülkelerinde Hayvansal Ürün Politikaları ve Bu Politikalar Sonucu Ortaya Çıkan Transferler]. Hayvansal Üretim, 46(1), 1-7.
17. Rehber, E. (1993). Agricultural Management and Planning [Tarımsal işletmecilik ve Planlama]. Uludag University, publication no:84, Bursa, Turkey
18. Semerci, A. (2013). The Effects of Agrıcultural Subsıdıes on Sunflower Cultıvatıon and Farmers’ Income: Evıdence from Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 50 (1), 139-145.
19. Semerci, A. (2016). Effects of agricultural supports on farmer’s revenue and product costs: the case of Turkey. Custos e @gronegócio on line, 12 (3), 71-96.
20. Strelecek, F., Lososova, J. & Zdenek, R. (2009). Comparison of agricultural subsidies in the Czech Republic and in the selected states of the European Union. Agricultural Economics Czech, 55, 519-533.
21. Suzer, S. 2015. Effects of Plant Nutrition on Canola (Brassica napus L.) growth. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 16(2), 87-90.
22. Taheri-Garavand, A., Asakereh, A., & Haghani, K. (2010). Energy elevation and economic analysis of canola production in Iran a case study: Mazandaran province. Internatıonal Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(2), 236-242.
23. TURKSTAT. (2016). Crop Production Statistics, Turkish Statistical Institute. Retrieved from http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul.
24. Unakıtan, G., Hurma, H. &Yilmaz, F. (2010). An analysis of energy use efficiency of canola production in Turkey. Energy 35,3623-3627.
25. Unakıtan, G., & Kumbar, N. (2010). Factor Demand Analysis for Canola Production in Turkey. New Medıt, 4, 59-64.
26. Yilmaz, H., Demircan, V., & Dernek. Z. (2006). A Research on farmers’ opinions about effect of agricultural policy implemented after 2000 in Turkey. [Türkiye de 2000 Yılı Sonrası Uygulanan Tarım Politikalarının Yansımalarına İlişkin Üretici Görüşleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma]. The Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Agriculture, 1 (2), 62-70.
27. Yilmaz, H., Demircan. V., & Dernek, Z. (2008). Direct Income Support Implementation in Turkish Agriculture - Evaluation of Farmers in Isparta Province-.[Türkiye Tarımında Doğrudan Gelir Desteği Uygulamaları-Isparta İli Üreticileri Açısından Bir Değerlendirme], Doguş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9 (2), 248-265.
Published
2020-06-24
How to Cite
YILMAZ, Hasan; AVKIRAN, Buse. ANALYSIS OF CANOLA (RAPESEED) PRODUCTION COST AND INCOME IN CONTEXT OF OILSEEDS PRODUCTION SUPPORT POLICIES: A CASE STUDY FROM TRAKYA REGION OF TURKEY. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 67, n. 2, p. 483-493, june 2020. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <http://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/1684>. Date accessed: 19 sep. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2002483Y.
Section
Original scientific papers