Honey production and its externality effects

  • Ványi Árváné Georgina, PhD student University of Debrecen, Centre for Agricultural and Applied Economic Sciences, Faculty of Applied Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Business Economics, Department of Commerce and Marketing
  • Zsolt Csapó, PhD
  • László Kárpáti, PhD
  • András Nábrádi, PhD


Bee-keeping and honey production has a long history in Hungary. The honey production has important role in rural life. It is confirmed by researchers’ studies that plant pollination by honey bees has significant positive external impacts on potential yields in orchards.

Although the contribution of honey production to the GDP in Hungary is only a few per cent, other benefits play a more important role.

This paper focuses on secondary research methods, gathering and evaluating figures regarding the positive external impacts of plant pollination by honey bees as well as finding possible solution for the problem that bee-keepers have a lot of costs in connection with carrying honey bees to orchards, while farmers “only” benefit from the positive externality of plant pollination in their fields. To evaluate its economic effects a numerical HEEM-model was developed and applied for the Hungarian situation. The financial outcome of the bee-keeping sector contributes considerably to the rural development in Hungary.


Download data is not yet available.


1. BORNECK, R. – BRICOUT, B. (1989): Essai d’une évaluation économique de l’abeille pollinisatrice dans l’agriculture européenne. Apiacta. 24:33-38.
2. CARRECK, N. – WILLIAMS, I. (1998): The economic value of bees in the UK. Bee World. 79 (3): 115-23.
3. WILLIAMS, I. H. (1994): The dependence of crop production within the European Union on pollination by honey bees. Agricultural Science Reviews. 6:229-257.
4. MAZER, S. J. (2007): Book reviewed – Status of Pollinators in North America – by The Committee on the Status of Pollinators in North America, National Research Council of the National Academies. The National Academies Press. 2007. 307. pp.
5. KLEIN, A. M. – VAISSIERE, B. E. – STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I. – CUNNINGHAM, S. A. – CLAIRE, K. – TSCHRANTKE, T. (2006): Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
6. MORSE, R. A. – CALDERONE, N. W. (2000): The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. crops in 2000. Bee Cult. 128:1-15.
7. LOSEY, J. E. – VAUGHAN, M. (2006): The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bio Science. 56:311-323.
8. ROBINSON, W. S. – NOWOGRODZKI, R. – MORSE, R. A. (1989): The value of honey bees as pollinators of the United States crops. Am Bee J 129:477–487.
9. COOK, D.C. – THOMAS, M. B. – CUNNINGHAM, S. A. – ANDERSON, D.L. - DE BARRO, P. J. (2007): Predicting the economic impact of an invasive species on an ecosystem service. Ecol Appl 17:1832–1840.
10. GILL, R. A. (1985): Biological control of Echium species. Industries Assistance Commission, report No. 371. Canberra: Australian Government Printer.
11. ALLSOPP, M. H. – CHERRY, M. (2004): An assessment of the impact on the bee and agricultural industries in the Western Cape of the clearing of certain Eucalyptus species using questionnaire survey data. p. 58. Pretoria (South Africa): National Government of the Republic of South Africa, Department of Water Affairs, Internal Final Report.
12. TURPIE, J. K. – HEYDENRYCH, B. J. – LAMBERTH, S. J. (2003): Economic value of terrestrial and marine biodiversity in the Cape Floristic region: implications for defning effective and socially optimal strategies. Biol Cons 112:233–251.
13. RICHARDS, K.W. (1993): Non-Apis bees as crop pollinators. Rev Suisse Zool 100:807–822.
14. WILLIAMS, I.H. (1996): Aspects of bee diversity and crop pollination in the European Union. In: Matheson A, Buchmann SL, O'Toole C, Westrich P, Williams IH, editors. The Conservation of Bees New York: Academic Press; pp. 63–80.
15. RICHARDS, A.J. (2001): Does low biodiversity resulting from modern agricultural practice affect crop pollination and yield? Annals Bot 88:165–172.
16. ALLSOPP, M. H. – LANGE, W. J. de – Veldtman, R. (2008): Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(9): e3128. Published online 2008 September 10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003128.
17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2519790/, date of download: June 25, 2010.
18. DAILY, G. C. (Ed.). (1997): Nature's services. Societal dependence on natural ecosystems Island Press, Washington, DC. 392 pp. ISBN 1-55963-475-8 (hbk), 1 55963 476 6 (soft cover).
19. GILL, R. A. (1991): The value of honeybee pollination to society. Apiacta 4. 1991.
20. HELLER, L. (2008): Scientist examine health in honey.http://www.nutraingredientsusa.com/content/view/print/178894, date of download: April 22, 2009.
21. KEVAN, P. G. – CLARK, E. A. – THOMAS, V. G. (2008): Insect Pollinators and sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 5. 13-22. Cambridge University Press.
22. KOPÁNYI, M. (1993): Mikroökonómia. Budapesti Közgazdaságtudományi Egyetem. Műszaki Könyvkiadó, Budapest.
23. KOZÁR, L. (2010): Price risk management using by a specifed futures model. APSTRACT. Vol. 4. Number 3-4.
24. MCGREGOR, S. E. (1976): Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants. Agricultural Handbook. No. 496. A. R. S., U.S.D.A., Washington D.C., p. 411.
25. PALMER, M. – BERNHARDT, E. – CHORNESKY, E. - COLLINS, S. - DOBSON, A. - DUKE, C. - GOLD, B. - JACOBSON, R. - KINGSLAND, S. - KRANZ, R. - MAPPIN, M. - MARTINEZ, M. L. - MICHELI, F. - MORSE, J. - PACE, M. - PASCUAL, M. - PALUMBI, S. - REICHMAN, O. J. - SIMONS, A. - TOWNSEND, A. – TURNER, M. (2004): Ecology for a Crowded Planet. Science. Vol 304. 28 May 2004. http://www.esa.org/ecovisions/ppfles/Palmer_et_al_SCIENCE2004.pdf, date of download: June 25, 2010.
26. SOUTHWICK, E. E. – SOUTHWICK, JR. L. (1992): Estimating the economic value of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as agricultural pollinators in the United States. Journal of Economic Entomology. Volume 85. Number 3. June 1992., pp. 621-633. Entomological Society of America.
27. FAOSTAT. Production Livestock Primary. http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/default.aspx#ancor, date of download: July 25, 2010.
28. ZIMÁNYI, K. (2006): E-business technologies and its application in agribusiness. PhD dissertation. University of Debrecen.
How to Cite
ÁRVÁNÉ GEORGINA, Ványi et al. Honey production and its externality effects. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 57, n. Spec.num.2, p. 409-418, dec. 2010. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <http://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/1019>. Date accessed: 24 sep. 2020.