ROMANIAN RURAL AREAS TODAY: FROM UNDERPERFORMANCE TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Roberta Stanef Mihaela, PhD Assist., Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest
  • Stefania Chenic Alina, PhD Assist., Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest
  • Magdalena Manole Alina PhD Candidate., Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest

Keywords:

rural area, competitiveness, rural policy, sustainable development

Abstract

EU cohesion policy measures aim to overcome interregional disparities and strengthen backward regions, while rural development policy should contribute to the better standard of life of rural inhabitants To achieve synergy between these policies (and many others), a stronger linkage is needed between the development strategies of regions and the strategies of development formulated by component localities Competitiveness has become a key term in economic theory in general, and in the EU in particular.

The problem of the sustainable development of the rural areas constitutes a high priority for Romania as a new member of the European Union This can be entailed by implementing a coherent strategy that can realize a balance between the need to preserve the economic, ecologic and socio-cultural area on one hand, and the tendency of country life modernization, on the other side.

Although the Romanian rural area hosts a rich culture with a strong traditional character, with regional differences, this cannot fully put into value its resources, and a paradoxical scarcity is maintained, due to the lack of attractiveness and promotion of rural areas

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Burja C., Burja V. (2008), Performanţa economică a exploataţiilor agricole în sistemul dezvoltării durabile, Editura Casa cărţii de ştiinţă, Cluj-Napoca
2. BM, MMFES, INS, România: Raport de evaluare a sărăciei, http://siteresources.worldbank.org
3. EU Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), http://eufnantare.info/regulamente/1698_ro.html
4. EU, Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development – Rural development in the European Union statistical and economic information, Report 2007, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/agrista/rurdev2007/index_en.htm
5. INS, România în cifre, 2011, www.insse.ro
6. MARD, National Rural Development Programme 2007-2013, www.maap.ro
7. MARD, National Strategy Plan for Rural Development, 2007-2013, www.maap.ro
8. Mateoc-Sîrb, Nicoleta, (2002), Dezvoltarea rurală şi regională în România, Editura Agroprint, Timişoara.
9. Mateoc-Sîrb, Nicoleta, Man, T.E., (2007), Dezvoltarea rurală şi regională durabilă a satului românesc, Editura Politehnica, Timişoara.
10. Otiman, P.I., coordonator şi alţii (2006), Dezvoltarea rurală durabilă în România, Editura Academiei Române, Bucureşti.
11. Otiman P.I. (2007), Viaţa rurală românească pe lungul drum între Flămânzi şi Uniunea Europeană, Editura Academiei Române, Bucureşti,
12. Zoltán S., Spaţiul rural românesc între identitate şi globalizare, www.historycluj.ro/SU/cercet/Salanki/SpatiuRural.htm

Downloads

Published

2012-04-30

How to Cite

Stanef Mihaela, R., Chenic Alina, S., & Manole Alina, M. (2012). ROMANIAN RURAL AREAS TODAY: FROM UNDERPERFORMANCE TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Economics of Agriculture, 59(Special nu), 382–389. Retrieved from https://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/684