POSTINDUSTRIAL ECONOMY AND THE PROPERTY

Authors

  • Gabriel POPESCU Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Faculty of Agri-Food and Environmental Economics, Bucharest

Keywords:

property, capitalism, industrialism, agriculture, land, peasant.

Abstract

The fundamental problem, and at the same time, the great challenge of Romanian agrarian policy, as well as related sciences, is the chronic poverty of peasants, agricultural land owners.

This issue suggests that the land, as an essential element of ownership, paradoxically, no longer creates welfare for the peasants. Hence, is only natural to ask: What does the peasant still wants or expects from the land? or Why is the peasant still attached to the land?

Most researchers of Agricultural Economics would respond to these questions quantifying and analyzing the results of household production. Their approach is not wrong, yet not suffcient. After all, they study the visible part of the iceberg. A complete or nearly complete answer requires deeper inquiries, with reference to other areas of knowledge than the economic one, such as sociology, psychology, culture, history, morality, religion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Adrian Dobre, Aspecte generale privind proprietatea şi scurt istoric al proprietăţii, http://www.juridice.ro/166361/aspecte-generale-privind-proprietatea-si-scurtistoric-al-proprietatii.html
2. Constantin Oprişan (1997), Regimul general al proprietăţii în România în "Studii de Drept Românesc", nr.1/1995, p. 5/35;
3. Corneliu Bârsan, Maria Gaiţă, Mona Maria Pivniceru, (2007), Drept Civil, Drepturile reale, Ed. Institutului European, Iaşi, p. 22
4. Corneliu Bârsan (2007), Drept Civil. Drepturile reale principale, second edition, revised and enlarged, Ed. Hamangiu, Bucureşti, , p. 27.
5. Constantin Dobrogeanu Gherea (1976), Opere Complete, vol. 1, Ed. Politică, Bucureşti, p. 26
6. Eugen Chelaru (2001), Law no. 10/2001 regarding the legal status of abusively taken over property between March 6, 1945 - 22 December 1989, commented and annotated, Ed. All Beck, Bucharest, p. 3
7. Hernando de Soto (2000), The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else, p.10
8. Riffkin (2006), mentioned in this regard " (...) in the era of the market, freedom was defned as autonomy. A person is free to the extent that is not dependent on or indebted to another. To be independent, a person needs property. With property, come exclusivity and freedom How does someone acquire property Competing with others within the competitive market. Network Commerce provides a definition of freedom diametrically opposite Freedom is achieved through belonging and not through possession. To belong, a person needs access. By holding this access he can enjoy the freedom flowing from inclusion. Freedom is rather shared relationships, not isolation.", in Visul European Ed. Polirom, Iaşi (p.161, 162)
9. Toffler A., Toffler Heidi (2006), Avuţia în mişcare, Ed. Antet, Bucureşti, p. 229
10. Todd G. Buchholz (2004), Idei noi de la economişti morţi, Editura Andreco Educaţional, Bucureşti, from the "Foreword", p.8

Downloads

Published

2012-04-30

How to Cite

POPESCU, G. (2012). POSTINDUSTRIAL ECONOMY AND THE PROPERTY. Economics of Agriculture, 59(Special nu), 23–28. Retrieved from https://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/630