ECONOMIC FACTORS OF RURAL AREA DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION, FINANCIAL SOURCES AND HUMAN RESOURCES

Abstract

The complexity of borders and border area in terms of European Union, cohesion policy, implementation of cross-border program 2007-2013 in urban and rural areas of Hungary and Croatia, monitoring the impact of invested funds and their comprehensiveness, the attitude of beneficiaries of infrastructural and human resources development projects are discussed in this paper. All in the light of given possibilities and untapped opportunities that can bring significant benefits to this area. The primary survey is conducted in the observed area after the implementation of all approved cross-border projects. Besides, available data sources and implemented research in the cross-border area of Hungary and Croatia are also discussed. The paper seeks to contribute to the discourse on the subject of monitoring the overall impact of the implemented activities in the cross-border area because there are no similar studies that comprehensively approach this complex problem for areas of cross-border cooperation in the European Union.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Acemoglu, D. (1996). A microfoundation for social increasing returns in human capital accumulation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 779-804.
2. Anderson, J. (1996). The shifting stage of politics: new medieval and postmodern territorialities?. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(2), 133-153.
3. Anderson, J., O’Dowd, L., & Wilson, T. M. (Eds.). (2004). New borders for a changing Europe: cross-border cooperation and governance. Psychology Press, pp. 3-7. DOI:10.4324/9780203508435
4. Anđelković-Stoilković, M., Devedžić, M., & Vojković, G. (2018). The border regions of Serbia: peripheral or marginal areas. Trames: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 22(2), 211. DOI:10.3176/tr.2018.2.07
5. Arandarenko, M., & Bartlett, W. (Eds.). (2012). Labour market and skills in the Western Balkans. FREN-Foundation for the Advancement of Economics, pp. 4.
6. IPA Cross-border cooperation Hungary – Croatia. Priorities. Retrieved from http://www.hu-hr-ipa.com/en/priorities (August 1, 2020)
7. Boman, J., & Berg, E. (2007). Identity and institutions shaping cross-border cooperation at the margins of the European Union. Regional & Federal Studies, 17(2), 195-215. DOI:10.1080/13597560701318516
8. Bryden, J. (2002). Rural development indicators and diversity in the European Union. In conference on “Measuring rural diversity”. Washington, DC.
9. Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Caragliu, A. (2019). Measuring the impact of legal and administrative international barriers on regional growth. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11(2), 345-366. DOI:10.1111/rsp3.12195
10. Capello, R., Caragliu, A., & Fratesi, U. (2018a). Breaking down the border: Physical, institutional and cultural obstacles. Economic Geography, 94(5), 485- 513. DOI:10.1080/00130095.2018.1444988
11. Capello, R., Caragliu, A., & Fratesi, U. (2018b). Measuring border effects in European cross-border regions. Regional Studies, 52(7), 986-996. DOI:10.1080/00343404.2017.1364843
12. CEC. (2008). Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion: turning territorial diversity into strength. Brussels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/paper_terco_en.pdf (July 30, 2020)
13. COTER. (2020). State of the art and challenges ahead for Territorial Impact Assessments. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://cor.europa.eu/en/engage/studies/Documents/TIA-State-of-Play.pdf (July 20, 2020)
14. Crescenzi, R., De Filippis, F., & Pierangeli, F. (2015). In tandem for cohesion? Synergies and conflicts between regional and agricultural policies of the European Union. Regional Studies, 49(4), 681-704. DOI:10.1080/00343404.2014.946401
15. Davey, K. (2003). Decentralization and Regional Development: The Rationale. Investing in Regional Development: Policies and Practices in EU Candidate Countries. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiaive. Opes Society Institute, 3-12. Retrieved from http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00006947/01/LGI_Investing-in-Regional-Development_2003.pdf (August 5, 2020)
16. Díaz-Puente, J. M., Yagüe, J. L., & Afonso, A. (2008). Building evaluation capacity in Spain: A case study of rural development and empowerment in the European Union. Evaluation Review, 32(5), 478-506. DOI:10.1177/0193841x08319015
17. Đokić, I. & Sumpor, M. (2011). Cross-border Cooperation in Central and SouthEast Europe: A Croatian Perspective. In World Planning Schools Congress 2011. Retrieved from https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/563221.479.pdf (August 3, 2020)
18. Đokić, M. (2019). Sustainable agricultural and rural development in the European Union. Economics of Sustainable Development. 3. 29-43. DOI:10.5937/esd1901029q
19. European Commission. (2005). Impact assessment guidelines. Brussels: EC.
20. ESPON (2011). Draft Final Report - Scientifc Report ESPON ARTS project. Retrieved from http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/ARTS/ARTS-Draft-FinalReport-Part_C.pdf (July 29, 2020)
21. ESPON (2013). ESPON 2013 Programme. Retrieved from https://www.espon./programme/espon/espon-2013-programme (July 10, 2020)
22. ESPON (2020). TIA CBC Final report. Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/TIACBC (July 29, 2020)
23. European Commission. (2015). Cross-border cooperation in the EU. Flash Eurobarometer 422. Aggregate report.
24. European Commission: DG AGRI - Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (2013). Rural Development in the EU: Statistical and Economic Information Report 2013. European Union
25. Eurostat (2020a). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/RCI/#?vis=nuts3.economy&lang=en (July 30, 2020)
26. Eurostat (2020b). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tgs00005&plugin=1 (July 20, 2020)
27. García-Álvarez, J., & Trillo-Santamaría, J. M. (2013). Between regional spaces and spaces of regionalism: Cross-border region building in the Spanish ‘state of the autonomies’. Regional Studies, 47(1), 104-115.
28. Gualini, E. (2003). Cross-border governance: inventing regions in a trans-national multi-level polity. disP-The Planning Review, 39(152), 43-52.
29. Hansen, N. M. (1976). The economic development of border regions, pp. 19.
30. Haselsberger, B. (2014). Decoding borders. Appreciating border impacts on space and people. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(4), 505-526.
31. IPA CBC Programme Hungary – Croatia 2007 – 2013. Programming Document. (2013) Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/fles/pdf/croatia/ipa/hu-hr_op_fnal_en.pdf (July 29, 2020)
32. Jakubowski, A. (2018). Asymmetry of Economic Development of Cross-Border Areas in the Context of Perception of Near-Border Location. Barometr Regionalny. Analizy i Prognozy, 16(2), 123-131.
33. Jusić, M., & Obradović, N. (2019) Enlargement Policy and Social Change in the Western Balkans. Sarajevo.
34. Knippschild, R., & Wiechmann, T. (2012). Supraregional partnerships in large cross-border areas—towards a new category of space in Europe?. Planning practice and research, 27(3), 297-314. DOI:10.1080/02697459.2012.670933
35. Mairate, A. (2006). The ‘added value’of European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 40(02), 167-177. DOI:10.1080/00343400600600496
36. Makkonen, T., & Williams, A. M. (2016). Border region studies: The structure of an ‘offbeat’feld of regional studies. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 355- 367. DOI:10.1080/21681376.2016.1209982
37. McCall, C., & Williamson, A. (2000). Fledgling social partnership in the Irish Border Region: European Union ‘community initiatives’ and the voluntary sector. Policy & Politics, 28(3), 397-410. DOI:10.1332/0305573002501045
38. Medeiros, E. (2015). Territorial impact assessment and cross-border cooperation. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 97-115.
39. Melecký, L. (2016). Changing of EU Project and Grant Management Approach in Response to New Trends of Programming Period 2014–2020. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on European Integration 2016. pp. 605-614.
40. Michalek, J., & Zarnekow, N. (2012). Construction and application of the Rural Development Index to analysis of rural regions (No. JRC72059). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
41. Miszczuk, A., & Jakubowski A. (2015). Evolution of the European Union Cohesion PolicyTowards Border Regions, in: A. J. Kukuła (ed.), Cohesion policy and development of the European Union’s regions in the perspective of 2020, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, pp. 169-191.
42. Nelles, J., & Walther, O. (2011). Changing European borders: from separation to interface? An introduction. Articulo - Journal of Urban Research, (6).
43. Newman, D. (2013). Boundaries, territory and postmodernity. Routledge, pp.6. DOI:10.4324/9781315038278
44. O’Dowd, L. (2002a). Transnational integration and cross-border regions in the European Union. Transnational democracy: Political spaces and border crossings, London: Routledge, 111-128. DOI:10.4324/9780203464427
45. O’Dowd, L. (2002b). The changing significance of European borders. Regional & Federal Studies, 12(4), 13-36. DOI:10.1080/714004774
46. Ohmae K. 1995. The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. New York, Free Press, pp. 28.
47. Paasi, A. (2002). Regional transformation in the European context: Notes on regions, boundaries and identity. Space and Polity, 6(2), 197-201.
48. Popescu, G. (2008). The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, 27(4), 418-438. DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002
49. Ravlić, S., Glavaš, J., & Šimunić, M. (2020). The impact of the IPA Cross-border co-operation Hungary - Croatia 2007 – 2013 programme - infrastructure, tourism and human capital. Zbornik Veleučilišta u Rijeci, 8 (1), 135-149.
50. Sohn, C. (2014). Modelling cross-border integration: The role of borders as a resource. Geopolitics, 19(3), 587-608. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2014.913029
51. Tevdovski, Dragan. (2012). The Economies of the Western Balkans in Transition. EU enlargement anno 2012: a progressive engagement, European Parliament, S&G Group. pp. 168-172.
52. Topaloglou, L., Kallioras, D., Manetos, P., & Petrakos, G. (2005). A border regions typology in the enlarged European Union. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 20(2), 67-89. DOI:10.1080/08865655.2005.9695644
53. Vidovic, H., Gligorov, V., Haupfleisch, R., Holzner, M., Korolkova, K., & Natter, M. (2011). Developing effcient activation approaches and identifying elements for regional cooperation in the Western Balkans. Wiiw Research report. pp. 145.
54. Vojinović, Ž., Živković, S., Piuković Babičković, B., Stevanović, S. (2017). Potential and status of development of the digital banking in Serbia. SM2017. pp.1- 8, Subotica (Serbia), Faculty of Economics Subotica, University of Novi Sad,
55. Zelenović, V., & Vojinović, Ž. (2017). Evolution in Banking Operations: From Transactions to Personal Relationships, Аnali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici 37, 143-153, UDC 336.71:005, ISSN: 0350-2120.
56. Zonneveld, W., & Waterhout, B. (2009). EU Territorial Impact Assessment: Under What Conditions?. In Territorial cohesion of Europe and integrative planning, 49th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, 25-29, Lodz, Poland. European Regional Science Association.
57. Zumbusch, K., & Scherer, R. (2015). Cross-border governance: Balancing formalized and less formalized co-operations. Social Sciences, 4(3), 499-519.
Published
2020-12-26
How to Cite
RAVLIĆ, Sanela; GLAVAŠ, Jerko; VOJINOVIĆ, Zeljko. ECONOMIC FACTORS OF RURAL AREA DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION, FINANCIAL SOURCES AND HUMAN RESOURCES. Economics of Agriculture, [S.l.], v. 67, n. 4, p. 1125-1139, dec. 2020. ISSN 2334-8453. Available at: <http://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/1807>. Date accessed: 18 jan. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2004125R.
Section
Original scientific papers