LITHUANIAN DIAGNOSTICS OF LAGGING TERRITORIES: EVALUATION AND INSIGHTS

Authors

  • William H. Meyers, PhD Professor of Agricultural Economics, FAPRI at University of Missouri-Columbia
  • Emilija Kairyt?, PhD Institute Ne Vork, Ljubljana
  • Erika Ribašauskien?, PhD Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Vilnius

Keywords:

investment, rural development, lagging rural areas, economic structure, competitiveness, social well-being, development indices, funding envelopes.

Abstract

During the period 2006-2007 diagnostics were conducted on territorial aspects of rural Lithuania with a special focus on the rural areas lagging behind. The study includes analysis of economic, demographic and social indicators of rural areas at a disaggregated level and a methodology enabling the assessment of opportunities and constraints and the comparisons of rural areas in various territories. The study objective is an improved set of diagnostics that captures territorial differences, improves the targeting of RDP measures and strengthens the framework for allocation and access to structural and rural development funds. The paper discusses diagnostic methods by reviewing concepts of rurality and presenting methods used for identifying and ranking leading and lagging territories. We use selected socio-economic indicators to describe differences among municipalities in Lithuania and identify the key factors that indicate more and less successful areas. These are then used to identify and rank leading and lagging municipalities with a development index.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bryden, J. M. Copus, A. and MacLeod. "Rural Development Indicators" in the Report of the PASI project, Phase 1. Report for Eurostat with LANDSIS, Luxembourg, February 2002.
2. Bryden, J., Efstratoglou, S., Persson, L-O., Schrader, H., Atterton, J., Ceccato, V., Courtney, P., Efstratoglou, A., Hachmöller, G., Hart, K., Koch, B., Kouroussi, E., Masurek, L., Apostolos Papadopoulos, A., Timm, A. Dynamics of Rural Areas. Final Report, December 2001.
3. Bryden, J M and Hart JK. Why Local Economies Differ: The Dynamics of Rural Areas in Europe. The Edwin Mellen Press, 2003.
4. Decree of the Government of Lithuania"Concerning the Criterias of Problematic Territories Determination" No. 112, 2006, January 31.
5. European Commission-Directorate General for Agriculture. Guidance note G – Baseline fiches. 2006. Preliminary document under negotiation with member states.
6. Ministry of Agriculture. Order of Minister of Agriculture 3D-72 and 3D-287 For less-favoured areas (2004 02 27, 2004 05 03), 2004.
7. Ministry of the Interior. The Initiatives of Social and Economical Differences Reduction of Regions 2004-2006, 2004 (Plan)
8. OECD. Creating rural indicators for shaping territorial policies, OECD Publications, Paris, 1994.
9. OECD: Territorial Indicators of Socio-Economic Patterns and Dynamics. OECD Publication DT/TDPC (2002)23, Paris.
10. Rural Development Programme for Lithuania 2007-2013 Draft, December 29th, Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture, 2006.
11. Saktina, D., Meyers W. H. and Rabinowicz E. "Development Policies for Lagging Rural Areas: Case Study of Latvia." Draft manuscript, Riga. 2006.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

H. Meyers, W., Kairytė, E., & Ribašauskienė, E. (2018). LITHUANIAN DIAGNOSTICS OF LAGGING TERRITORIES: EVALUATION AND INSIGHTS. Economics of Agriculture, 57(Special nu), 11–21. Retrieved from https://ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/1057